Author (year) | Title | Sample | Method | Role of Mindset | ||||
Participant | Size (gender) | Grade (country) | Collecting | Analyzing | ||||
1 | | The Effects of Selective Schooling and Self-concept on Adolescents’ Academic Aspiration: An Examination of Dweck’s Self-Theory | Student | N = 856 (M = 427, F = 429) | M (Britain) | Q | DS & RA & PMA | Cause |
2 | | Reducing the Effects of Stereotype Threat on African American College Students by Shaping Theories of Intelligence | Student | N = 79 | U ( USA) | Q | ANOVA & FA | Cause |
3 | | Implicit Theories of Intelligence Predict Achievement Across an Adolescent Transition: A Longitudinal Study and an Intervention | Student | Study 1: N = 373 (M = 175, F = 198); Study 2: N = 99 (M = 50, F = 49) | M (USA) | Q | RA & HLM | Cause |
4 | | Implicit Theories of Ability of Grade 6 Science Students: Relation to Epistemological Beliefs and Academic Motivation and Achievement in Science | Student | N = 508 | E (USA) | Q | DS & PMA | Cause |
5 | | Growth Mindset Tempers the Effect of Poverty on Academic Achievement | Student | N = 168,203 | E (Chile) | Q | HLM | Cause/ Mediator |
6 | | Implicit Theories of Intelligence, Goal Orientation, Cognitive Engagement, and Achievement: A Test of Dweck’s Model with Returning to School Adults | Student | N = 76 (M = 31, F = 45) | M (France) | Q | FA | No |
7 | Fonseca et al. (2009) | When Depression Mediates the Relationship Between Entity Beliefs and Performance | Student | N = 353 (M = 175, F = 178) | M (France) | T & Q | RA | Cause |
8 | | Implicit Theories of Intelligence, Perceived Academic Competence, and School Achievement: Testing Alternative Models | Student | First phase: N = 232 (M = 115, F = 117); Second phase: N = 187 (M = 91, F = 96) | E & M (Greece) | Q | ANOVA | Outcome |
9 | | Improving Adolescents’ Standardized Test Performance: An Intervention to Reduce the Effects of Stereotype Threat | Student | N = 138 (M = 76, F = 62) | M (USA) | I | ANOVA | Cause |
10 | | Implicit Theories and IQ Test Performance: A Sequential Mediational Analysis | Student | Study1: N = 47 (M = 23, F = 24); Study 2: N = 86 (M = 41, F = 45) | M (France) | Q | DS & FA & RA | Cause |
11 | | Children's Thinking about Traits: Implications for Judgments of the Self and Others | Student | Study 1: N = 86 (M = 40, F = 46); Study 2: N = 116 (M = 58, F = 58) | E (USA) | I | FA & ANOVA | Cause |
12 | | Implicit Theories, Goal Orientations, and Perceived Competence: Impact on Students’ Achievement Behavior | Student | N = 451 (M = 204, F = 247) | E & M (Greece) | Q | FA | Cause/ No1 |
13 | | Adolescents’ Autonomous Functioning and Implicit Theories of Ability as Predictors of Their School Achievement and Week-to-Week Study Regulation and Well-being | Student | N = 179 (M = 64, F = 115) | M (Greece) | Q | DS & FA & RA | Mediator |