Jerant et al. (2009) | Assess long-term effects of the CDSMP beyond 6 months | Not stated | Home based variant of CDSMP called Homing in on Health (HIOH) U.S. | RCT, measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. | ・ N = 415 ・ Convenience sample ・ Randomized to usual care, HIOH, or telephone intervention. ・ 78% - 75% female per group ・ Mean age: 60 ・ Caucasian 75% ・ Education: majority some college or beyond ・ Heterogeneous Disease Sample | ・ Demographics ・ Self-Efficacy (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96) ・ Health Status: SF-36 (previous validation) ・ Medical Outcomes Survey on General Health and EuroQol (EQ) health status and Visual Analog Scale (EQ VAS) (validity not addressed) ・ Functional Ability: Health-Assessment Questionnaire (composite alpha 0.92) ・ Hospital days prior to study | ・ The home group had significant increase in self-efficacy at 6 weeks and 6 years, but no difference at 1 year. ・ Health Status: the EQ VAS was increased in the home group at all three measured intervals, all other assessment of health status were not significant. ・ There were no significant effects on hospitalization at 1 year ・ Statistical significance not addressed | Interpretation: Consistent with previous studies that suggest that the CDSMP has short-term moderate effects. Questions whether implementation of CDSMP would be cost effective. Limitations: Majority were Caucasian, female, married, and well-educated which questions the generalizability. Participation was voluntary which may have affected the type of population and the dropout rate in the intervention group was high. Self-report instruments Generalizability: limited due to sample characteristics nor representative of population, volunteers could limit generalizability | 1b |
Rose et al. (2009) | Evaluate the effectiveness of the CDSMP when used with Urban African American older adults | Concept of Self-efficacy | Senior center, senior housing, and churches U.S. | ・ 1 group pretest and posttest design ・ 6 week CDSMP, adapted for African American population, ・ Lay leader from community and health professional ・ Follow up at 10 weeks and 6 months | ・ N = 153 ・ 86% African American ・ Mean Age: 72 ・ 82% female ・ Education 11.5 years ・ Heterogeneous Disease Sample ・ ・ ・ | ・ Demographics ・ Health Status ・ Health Service Utilization ・ Health Behavior ・ Perceived self-efficacy ・ Chronic Disease Impact ・ (all previously published validity and reliability) | ・ At 10 weeks: ・ Health behaviors showed a significant increase in stretching and strengthening (p = 0.04). 6 months (p = 0.03) ・ Significant increase in cognitive symptom management @10 weeks (P = 0.01); 6 months not significant ・ Improvement in health status variables, but not significant ・ No significant improvement in self-efficacy, healthcare utilization, or illness intrusiveness | ・ Interpretation: Participants felt needed more sessions. Results suggest potential benefit in this population ・ Limitations: No control group or randomization, High attrition rate in follow up data, ・ Generalizability: Cannot generalize the findings to African American Older Adults due to small sample size, volunteers could limit generalizability | 2b
|
Ersek et al. (2008) | Determine the efficacy of a pain self-management support group versus a self-education control group | None stated (CDSMP as resource) | Retirement communities U.S. | ・ Clustered RCT -baseline measured prior to randomization, assessed after intervention and at one year. ・ Pain Self-Management Group: 7 weekly sessions ・ ・ Leaders were nurses and psychologists | ・ Randomized by facility to control or intervention group. ・ N = 255 ・ Mean Age 82 years ・ 87% female ・ 93% Caucasian ・ 70% with post-secondary education ・ Diagnosed with arthritis | ・ Demographics ・ Physical Disability: Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (Validity/reliability and responsiveness to change addressed) ・ Pain intensity and interference: Brief Pain Inventory (reliability and validity stated) ・ Self-efficacy: Arthritis Efficacy Scale (internal consistency and test ?retest reliability) ・ Catastrophizing: Coping strategy questionnaire (validity and reliability in older adults stated) ・ -Coping: Chronic Pain Coping Inventory (acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability) | ・ In self-management group coping increased significantly over control group at post intervention and decrease in 1 year ・ No significant change in medication use in either group at post intervention or 1 year. ・ Slight decrease in pain and disability at 6 months with a 12% increase in pain in intervention group versus a 19% increase in the control group at 1 year. ・ Exercise (0.03) and relaxation (0.003) were only outcomes with statistical significance | Interpretation: Self-management may not be effective for all types of chronic disease. The overall study showed little effect between the self-management group and the study group. Recommendations for further studies evaluate effectiveness Limitations: not addressed, Self-report Generalizability: Cannot be generalized, volunteers could limit generalizability | 1b
|