IAIA SEA performance criteria | Rating | |
Is integrated | Ensures an appropriate environmental assessment of all strategic decisions relevant for the achievement of sustainable development. | ≈ (a) |
Addresses the interrelationships of biophysical, social and economic aspects. | χ (b) | |
Is tiered to policies in relevant sectors and (transboundary) regions and, where appropriate, to project EIA and decision making. | ≈ (c) | |
Is sustainability-led | Facilitates identification of development options and alternative proposals that are more sustainable. | ≈ (d) |
Is focused | Provides sufficient, reliable and usable information for development planning and decision-making. | √ (e) |
Concentrates on key issues of sustainable development. | χ (f) | |
Is customized to the characteristics of the decision making process. | √ (g) | |
Is cost- and time-effective. | ?χ (h) | |
Is accountable | Is the responsibility of the leading agencies for the strategic decision to be taken. | √ (i) |
Is carried out with professionalism, rigor, fairness, impartiality and balance. | ? | |
Is subject to independent checks and verification. | √ (j) | |
Documents and justifies how sustainability issues were taken into account in decision making. | χ (k) | |
Is participative | Informs and involves interested and affected public and government bodies throughout the decision making process. | ≈ (l) |
Explicitly addresses their inputs and concerns in documentation and decision-making. | χ (m) | |
Has clear, easily-understood information requirements and ensures sufficient access to all relevant information. | χ (n) | |
Is iterative | Ensures availability of the assessment results early enough to influence the decision making process and inspire future planning. | √ (o) |
Provides sufficient information on the actual impacts of implementing a strategic decision, to judge whether this decision should be amended and to provide a basis for future decisions. | ≈ (p) |