Arthur(s)

Title

Year

Publication

Laser System

Advantage

Scoffon et al.

The en-bloc no-touch holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) technique. World J Urol.

2016

World J Urol.

34(8): 1175-1181.

Lumenis Pulse

100H and 120H

The en-bloc no-touch technique has the potential to ease some difficult intraoperative steps and to improve the learning curve of HoLEP.

Liu et al.

Transurethral enucleation and resection of prostate in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia by plasma kinetics.

2010

J Urol.

184(6): 2440-2445.

Lumenis Pulse 120H

HoLEP treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia could achieve the advantages of open surgery the same effect. It had fewer damage, faster recovery, fewer complications, and is a good treatment option.

Klein et al.

Evolution of Day-case HoLEP Success Rate Over Time.

2020

J Endourol.

81(3): 62-73.

Lumenis Pulse 100H

HoLEP is a reliable and safe procedure with a high success rate improving over time.

Pirola et al.

Holmium laser versus thulium laser enucleation of the prostate: a matched-pair analysis from two centers. Therapeutic advances in urology.

2018

Urology.

10(8): 223-233.

Lumenis Pulse 120H

Both HoLEP (100 W) and ThuLEP (110 W) relieve lower urinary tract symptoms in a comparable way with high efficacy and safety, with negligible clinical differences.

Lwin et al.

Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate is Safe and Feasible as a Same Day Surgery.

2020

Urology.

138: 119-124.

Lumenis Pulse 120H

Same-day outpatient surgery for HoLEP is both safe and feasible and should be considered regardless of prostate size, comorbidities, age, or anticoagulation status.

Muhsin et al.

Feasibility of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate as a 1-day Surgery.

2019

World J Urol. 38(4): 1017-1025.

Lumenis Pulse 120H

HoLEP has proven successful as a same-day procedure with good safety profile in selected patients.

Lee et al.

Day-case Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Feasibility, Safety and Predictive Factors.

2018

Ann R Coll Surg

Engl. 100(6): 475-479.

N/A

Same-day HoLEP is both feasible and safe, with low readmission rates.

Minagawa et al.

En-Bloc Technique with Anteroposterior Dissection Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Allows a Short Operative Time and Acceptable Outcomes. Urology.

2015

Urology.

86(3): 628-633.

Lumenis Pulse 120H

A short operating time and may address concerns regarding the complexity of the enucleation procedure.

Comat et al.

Day-Case Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Prospective Evaluation of 90 Consecutive Case.

2017

JJ Endourol 31(10): 1056-1061.

Lumenis Pulse

100H and 120H

Same-day HoLEP has proven successful regardless of prostate volume, and may be performed by a trained surgeon with an appropriate patient selection.

Rapopo et al.

En bloc holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP EN BLOC): Our experience.

2018

Urologiia

65(3): 83-87.

HoLEP is a safe, highly efficacious and a size-independent procedure.

Tayeb et al.

Wolf Piranha Versus Lumenis VersaCut Prostate Morcellation Devices: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

2016

J Urol.

195(2): 413-417.

Piranha is more efficient in tissue removal

Rivera et al.

A Survey of Morcellator Preference and Cost Comparison of the Lumenis VersaCut and Wolf Piranha Morcellators.

2018

Urology.

111: 54-58.

Significant improved efficiency and improved cost savings utilizing the Piranha morcellator even when controlling for disposable costs

Deng et al.

Bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral enucleation and resection versus bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral resection for surgically treating large (≥60 g) prostates: a propensity score-matched analysis with a 3-year follow-up

2021

Urology and nephrology

73(3): 376-383.

For patients with large (≥60 g) prostates, BP-TUERP and BP-TURP are safe options, but the former is a more effective choice in long-term follow-up outcomes. BP-TUERP is related to reduced CT and hemoglobin decrease with more removal of prostatic tissue at the expense of longer OT than BP-TURP.