Theorist

Year

Criteria in urban public spaces

Jacobs J.

[14]

1961

Order activity on visual order, mixed use, permeability, possibility of monitoring and caring, diversity and richness of activities, paying attention to Streets, the possibility of social incorporation, the richness of activities, flexibility.

Lynch K.

[15]

1981

Compatibility, access and control, efficiency, equity, social vitality

Violich F.

[16]

1983

Readability of the environment, freedom of choice, contrasting urban forms, able to deliver the voice of past, to listen to the voices of the past, paying attention to the native-region link.

Bentley I.

[17]

1985

Permeability, variety, flexibility, permeability, variability (form), readability, flexibility, visual adaptability, richness, possibility of personalizing.

Trancik R.

[18]

1986

Keeping the movement connections, focusing on spaces, continuity of the edges, controlling the axis of vision and perspective, combining of the internal and external spaces.

Greene S.

[19]

1992

Access and communication, diversity of users, security, consistency, clarity, coherence, identity of unity, character, charm of scale, proportion of visual function, vitality.

Haughton G, Hunter C.

[20]

1994

Democracy, permeability, security, economy and its tools, consultation and participation of users, flexibility

Punter J. V, Carmona M. [21]

1997

Land use, pedestrian movement, patterns of behavior, riding movement flow, permeability, public perception, qualitative evaluations, operations, concept recalling, objective perspective, synthetic form

Pakzad J.

[22]

2007

Safety, vitality, space, flexibility.

Habibi S. M. [23]

2010

Diversity, safety and security, compatibility, social role, distinction and character, legibility, permanence, spatial contrast, turning points, pausing places, human scale, flexibility, weather conditions