| Material | Pretreatment method | State of surface | Coating material(s) | Method of depositiona | Mean decrease of corrosion rate of coated specimen compared to uncoated specimen | Ref. # |
| Mg | Fluorination | Passivated layer of HF | HA | Sol-gel (coating calcinated at 500˚C for 2 h in vacuo) | 82% after immersion in revised SBF, at 37˚C | 72 |
| Mg |
|
| TCP doped with 5 wt% Ag | Excimer laser | 99.5% after 2 h in Hanks Balanced Salt Solution | 71
|
| Mg |
|
| NanoHA-PLGA composite microspheres + nanoHA particles | Electrophoretic deposition (EPD) | 88% after 16 hin PBS, at 37˚C | 74 |
| Mg |
|
| NanoHA | Transonicparticle acceleration | 31% in r-PBS | 75 |
| AM50 |
|
| 1st layer: Ti-O | Electron beam physical vapor deposition | 41% after 0.25 h in SBF, at 37˚C (electrochemicaltest) | 76 |
|
|
|
| Top layer: PLLA | Dip coating | 65% after 18 d in SBF, at 37˚C (immersion test) |
|
| AZ31 | Biomimetic mineralization | Polydopamine layer | HA | CaP solution | 96% after immersion in Kokubo SBF, at 37˚C | 77 |
| AZ31 |
|
| NanoHA | Pulse electro-deposition | 51% after 40 h immersion in SBF at 37˚C 93% in Potentiodynamic tests, in SBFat 37˚C | 78 |
| AZ31 |
|
| NanoHA | Sol-gel | 87% in c-SBF, at 37˚C | 79 |
| AZ31 |
|
| NanoHA | Radio frequency Magnetron sputtering | 93% after immersion in 3.5 wt% NaCl Solution, at 37˚C | 80 |
| AZ91 | Micro-arc oxidation | Rough and porous | Nanostructured Ca2MgSi2O7 (akermanite) | EPD | 81% after 672 h in SBF, at 37˚C | 81
|
| AZ91 | Micro-arc oxidation | Rough and porous | NanoHA | EPD | 98% after 1 h in SBF, at 37˚C | 82 |
| AZ91 |
|
| NanoHA | Sol-gel | 87% after 1 h in SBF, at 37˚C | 79 |
|
|
|
| NanoHA | EPD | 90% after 1 h in SBF, at 37˚C | 79 |
| WE43 |
|
| 1st layer: HA | Chemicalreaction | 88% after 10 d in Kokubo SBF, at 37˚C | 83 |
|
|
|
| Top layer: PLLA | Dip coating |
|
|