| | 2 cross-sectional studies | PsyCap, safety climate, positive and negative affect | PCQ, Nordic questionnaire on work-related safety in the building and construction business, PANAS | To examine if the PsyCap of Norwegian air traffic controllers is related to their perceptions of safety climate. Study 1: association of PsyCap with safety climate. Study 2: control for the mediation of positive and negative affect | Study 1: 77 air traffic controllers Study 2: 38 air traffic controllers from eight additional centers | Study 1: PsyCap was positively correlated with safety climate. PsyCap explained 31% of the variance in safety climate. Study 2: Controlling for mediating effects of positive and negative emotions, PsyCap explained 15.5% of the variance |
| | Cross-sectional | Thriving, agentic work behaviors, Psychological capital, supervisor support, work performance | 10-item measure of thriving at work, four questions to measure attention at work, PCQ, five items from the organizational climate measure, four items from the in-role performance subscale | To test thriving at work with self-development, agentic work behaviors, PsyCap and supervisor support climate as antecedent variables | 198 employee-supervisor dyads | PsyCap positively correlated with all variables. Thriving at work was positively related to supervisor-rated employee development at work. Thriving led to better performance and development |
| | Cross-sectional | Hope, work engagement, job and service recovery performance, extra-role customer service | THS, short version of the Utrecht WE scale, five items to measure JP, Five items for operationalizing SRP, ERCS | To test whether work engagement mediates the effect of hope on job performance, service recovery performance, and extra-role customer service | 110 full-time front-line hotel employees and their managers | Structural Equation Modeling suggested that the impact of hope on job performance, service recovery performance, and extra-role customer service was fully mediated by work engagement |