Study ID | Surgery | Final BCVA | Primary re-attachment Event | Final re-attachment rate | Operation time, min (μ ± σ) | Number of operations to anatomic success (μ ± σ) | Target F/U, months |
Weichelet al. [1] | PPV | 0.38±0.33 | 63 | 100% | - | - | 10.93 |
Comparison Arm | SB + PPV | 0.55±0.32 | 79 | 100% | - | - | 8.60 |
Mehtaet al. [2] | PPV | 0.2758 | 31 | 100% | - | - | 13.2 |
Comparison Arm | SB + PPV | 0.2518 | 66 | 100% | - | - | 13.2 months |
Kessner and Barak, [3] | PPV | 0.486 (20/ 61.239) | 27 | 100% |
|
| <2 |
Comparison Arm | SB + PPV | 0.580 (20/76.038) | 25 | 100% |
| -- | <2 |
Al Taisanet al. [4] | PPV | - | 61 | 98.7% | - | - | 19.2 ± 11 |
Comparison Arm | SB + PPV | - | 27 | 100% | - | - | 18.2 ± 11 |
Mehboob et al. [5] | PPV | - | 85 | 100% |
|
| 27.94 ± 2.11 |
Comparison Arm | SB + PPV | - | 83
| 100% |
|
| 31.93 ± 1.26 |
Stangos et al. [6] | PPV | 0.82 ±1.10 | 25 | 100 |
|
| 12.45 ± 5.23 |
Comparison Arm | SB + PPV | 0.97 ±0.78 | 41 | 100 |
|
| 12.45 ± 5.23 |
Orlin et al. [7] | PPV | 0.418 | 43 | 100% |
|
| 406.73 days |
Comparison Arm | SB + PPV | 0.479 | 19 | 100% |
|
| 502.14 days |
Ong et al. [8] | PPV | - | 83 | 100 |
|
| 6 |
Comparison Arm | SB + PPV | - | 87 | 100 |
|
| 6 |
Vangipuram et al. [9] | PPV | 2.12 | 107 | 137 (99.27%) |
|
| 6 |
Comparison Arm | SB + PPV | 1.26 | 78 | 84 (98.8%) |
|
| 6 |
Kim et al. Part 1 [10] | Lens-sparing | 0.11 ± 0.30 | 55 (91.7) | 60 (100) | 55.8 ± 15.0 | - | 27.3 ± 16.3 |
Comparison Arm | Phaco-procedure | 0.10 ± 0.18 | 41(97.6) | 42 (100) | 62.7 ± 12.9 | - | 25.8 ± 15.3 |
Kim et al.Part 2 [10] | Lens-sparing | 0.16 ± 0.25 | 48 (94.1) | 51 (100) | 103.9 ± 41.3 | - | 26.6 ± 15.6 |
Comparison Arm | Phaco-procedure | 0.22 ± 0.42 | 34 (85) | 40 (100) | 128.0 ± 54.5 | - | 24.8 ± 16.1 |