| Theme | Subtheme | Sub-subtheme | Item (No) | Informant |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Strategy of Local Government in Waste Management in Sumedang Regency West Java Province (Case Study of Management of Household Waste in Jatinangor District) *(Stephen P Robbins and Marry Coulter, 2016) (George Tcobanoglous and Frank Kreith, 2002) | 1. Strengths *SWOT (Rangkuti, 2014) | 1. Legal basis/regulation | 1 | 5, 6 |
| 2. Commitment | 2 | 5, 7 | ||
| 3. Existence of Komunitas Peduli Sampah Jatinangor (KPSJ) | 3 | 6, 9 | ||
| 4. Jatinangor as education area | 4 | 1, 5, 9 | ||
| 5. Loyalty | 5 | 6, 8 | ||
| 2. Weaknesses *SWOT (Rangkuti, 2014) | 1. Competence of apparatus | 6 | 5, 6, 8 | |
| 2. Limited facilities and infrastructures | 7 | 6, 8 | ||
| 3. Lack of promotion | 8 | 8, 9 | ||
| 4. Use of technology | 9 | 6, 7 | ||
| 5. Public participation | 10 | 3, 9, 10, 11 | ||
| 3. Opportunities *SWOT (Rangkuti, 2014) | 1. Cooperation between sectors | 11 | 4, 8 | |
| 2. Support from Government | 12 | 2, 3, 5 | ||
| 3. Existence of Work Team of AMPL | 13 | 5, 6 | ||
| 4. Community-based total sanitation program | 14 | 5, 6 | ||
| 5. Innovation | 15 | 8, 9 | ||
| 4. Threats *SWOT (Rangkuti, 2014 | 1. Increasing production of waste | 16 | 2, 6, 10 | |
| 2. Change of city spatial planning | 17 | 4, 9 | ||
| 3. Effect of waste | 18 | 8, 10, 11 | ||
| 4. Geographical condition | 19 | 7, 8 | ||
| 5. Population growth rate | 20 | 4, 8 | ||
|
| Determination of SWOT Matrix Strategy and Litmus Test | 1. SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) Matrix | Analysis of internal factor | |
| Analysis of external factor | ||||
| 2. Litmus Test | Determining strategic level of an issue | |||
| Supporting and inhibiting factors | Supporting Factors (Robbins and Judges, 2016) | 1. Nature of manpower | 21 | 5 |
| 2. Technology | 22 | 8 | ||
| 3. Economic shock | 23 | 1, 2 | ||
| 4. Social trend | 24 | 3 | ||
| 5. Competition | 25 | 5 | ||
| Inhibiting Factors (Robbins in Winardi, 2008, and developed by author) | 1. Habits | 26 | 9 | |
| 2. Social Change | 27 | 4 | ||
| 3. Structural Weaknesses | 28 | 6 | ||
| 4. Skill threat | 29 | 6.7 | ||
| 5. Threat of resource allocation | 30 | 5 | ||
| Efforts to overcome the inhibiting factors | Efforts to overcome the Inhibiting Factors (Robbins and Judges, 2016, developed by author) | 1. Education and communication | 32 | 6 |
| 2. Participation | 33 | 5 | ||
| 3. Building support and commitment | 34 | 6.3 | ||
| 4. Developing positive rapport | 35 | 7 | ||
| 5. Coercion | 36 | 1.8 | ||
| 6. Providing of facilities and infrastructures | 37 | 5 | ||