Subjects |
|
Age (years) | 40.79 ± 7.79 (25 - 60) |
Working lifetime (years) | 17.04 ± 9.18 (1 - 40) |
Hospital levels |
|
Tertiary hospital (n) | 59 (48.36%) |
Secondary hospital (n) | 63 (51.64%) |
Education levels |
|
Bachelor degree (n) | 84 (68.85%) |
Master degree (n) | 33 (27.05%) |
Doctoral degree (n) | 5 (0.41%) |
Title of respondents |
|
Primary (n) | 20 (16.39%) |
Secondary (n) | 61 (50.00%) |
Senior (n) | 41 (33.61%) |
The use of MUFP in Cesarean Delivery |
|
With MUFP (n) | 121 (99.18%) |
Without MUFP (n) | 1 (0.82%) |
Characteristics of spontaneous vaginal delivery |
|
The use of UFP in spontaneous vaginal delivery |
|
Frequently (n) | 31 (25.41%) |
Occasionally (n) | 86 (70.49%) |
Never (n) | 5 (4.10%) |
Heard or treatment of rupture of liver, spleen and uterus |
|
Yes (n) | 26 (21.31%) |
No (n) | 96 (78.69%) |
If MUFP is effective and helpful |
|
Yes (n) | 116 (95.08%) |
No (n) | 6 (4.92%) |
If MUFP can decrease the assisted vaginal deliveries |
|
Yes (n) | 102 (83.61%) |
No (n) | 20 (16.39%) |
The most appropriate time of MUFP in the second stage |
|
Station +1 (S+1) (n) | 4 (3.28%) |
Station +2 (S+2) (n) | 14 (11.48%) |
Station +3 (S+3) (n) | 104 (85.24%) |