| Subjects |
|
| Age (years) | 40.79 ± 7.79 (25 - 60) |
| Working lifetime (years) | 17.04 ± 9.18 (1 - 40) |
| Hospital levels |
|
| Tertiary hospital (n) | 59 (48.36%) |
| Secondary hospital (n) | 63 (51.64%) |
| Education levels |
|
| Bachelor degree (n) | 84 (68.85%) |
| Master degree (n) | 33 (27.05%) |
| Doctoral degree (n) | 5 (0.41%) |
| Title of respondents |
|
| Primary (n) | 20 (16.39%) |
| Secondary (n) | 61 (50.00%) |
| Senior (n) | 41 (33.61%) |
| The use of MUFP in Cesarean Delivery |
|
| With MUFP (n) | 121 (99.18%) |
| Without MUFP (n) | 1 (0.82%) |
| Characteristics of spontaneous vaginal delivery |
|
| The use of UFP in spontaneous vaginal delivery |
|
| Frequently (n) | 31 (25.41%) |
| Occasionally (n) | 86 (70.49%) |
| Never (n) | 5 (4.10%) |
| Heard or treatment of rupture of liver, spleen and uterus |
|
| Yes (n) | 26 (21.31%) |
| No (n) | 96 (78.69%) |
| If MUFP is effective and helpful |
|
| Yes (n) | 116 (95.08%) |
| No (n) | 6 (4.92%) |
| If MUFP can decrease the assisted vaginal deliveries |
|
| Yes (n) | 102 (83.61%) |
| No (n) | 20 (16.39%) |
| The most appropriate time of MUFP in the second stage |
|
| Station +1 (S+1) (n) | 4 (3.28%) |
| Station +2 (S+2) (n) | 14 (11.48%) |
| Station +3 (S+3) (n) | 104 (85.24%) |