Field of Criteria

Consideration 1 (Developed by the author from literature review/final set of possible results and the present situations of the study area; previous section)

Evaluation 1

Consideration 2 (Results of satisfactions about present situations and selected sustainable issues within the study area)

Evaluation 2

Experts Participants

Local Participants (Occupation Group—Not Satisfied in %)

KCC

KDA

Planning Proposal

Physical Planning

1. Assessing and categories the resources of the area—physical, economic, social and cultural

√

Drainage systems

90.0%

87.1%

77.8%

40.0%

100.0%

74.2%

2. Livelihood standards within the built environment should enhanced

√

Air and Noise pollution

85.0%

82.3%

77.8%

60.0%

83.3%

100.0%

80.6%

3. Recovering urban network and public services with existing situations

√

Transportation systems

70.0%

50.0%

66.7%

20.0%

66.7%

70.0%

38.7%

4. Revitalizing urban design through river side and road network, side walk development

√

Width of Road and Side walk

65.0%

71.0%

66.7%

80.0%

66.7%

50.0%

64.5%

5. Introducing comprehensive and community breathing space

√

River side development

85.0%

90.3%

88.9%

100.0%

83.3%

90.0%

83.9%

6. Improving the accessibility providing public traffic and good side walk links

√

Drainage systems—83.9%, Air and Noise pollution—82.5%, Transportation—52.4%, Width of Road and Side walk—67.1%, River Side Area—88.1% (Not Satisfied in Total)

7. Endorsing with incorporating tradition and conserve the resources of the area

√

Economic Planning

1. Economic prospective of the area should utilized: a) Native profitable and multi-functional economic actions should developed b) Left over lands and historical building should conserved c) Educating and training of unskillful employees inside the area

√

Employment

and job

environment

20.0%

29.0%

55.6%

60.0%

33.3%

40.0%

29.0%

2. Generate new job with native profitable economic sectors

√

Shopping Facilities and Environments

25.0%

24.2%

22.2%

0.0%

33.3%

50.0%

19.4%

3. Promoting funds, stimulating investment with safe and secured places for all

√

Employment condition—31.5%, Shopping Facilities—24.5% (Not Satisfied in Total)

4. Control land tenure ship for community constancy

√

5. Reducing open land by increasing land values

√

Social Planning

1. Taking into account of social ties, justice and neighborhood-social structure —Privilege to minority for entrance within fundamental services—Social interaction with business men and local residents by creating more social activities

√

Accessibility towards Public services

30.0%

46.8%

22.2%

80.0%

33.3%

40.0%

51.6%

2. Improving slum area by education and employment opportunities, conserve and preserve social and cultural uniqueness and respecting livelihood approach for all

√

Open spaces and recreation facilities

85.0%

75.8%

100.0%

60.0%

66.7%

70.0%

90.3%

3. Enhancing the accessibility opportunities within—offices, schools, colleges, hospitals and prayer spaces

√

Accessibility towards Public services—44.1%, Open spaces and recreation facilities—80.4% (Not Satisfied in Total)

4. Controlling transfer rate from rural to urban area

√