|
| Responses of the health care providers and coordinators | Respondents % |
| 1 | A wide range of providers enables access and increases uptake of FP services | 99% |
| 2 | Sharing routine tasks allows higher cadre clinicians more time to use their specialized skills. | 96% |
| 3 | Reduces workload to the few available staff | 97% |
| 4 | It helps in enhancing community follow up | 89% |
| 5 | Ensures greater efficiency with higher productivity from each worker | 31% |
| Responses from the directors RHMSU | % | |
| 1 | The approach has the potential to positively contribute to strengthening health systems | 100% |
| 2 | The rationale behind the transferring of these tasks is that the alternative would be no service to those in need | 100% |
| 3 | Allows the facilities to increase access to services and coverage |
|
| 4 | Rapidly expands the number of health service providers by better using the available human resources. | 100% |
| 5 | Presents a viable option for health system cost savings | 100% |
| 6 | May be used to train alternate health care workers or lay persons to perform tasks generally considered to be within the purview of a few | 100% |
| 7 | Specialization promotes quality | 100% |
| 8 | It encourages staff retention especially in rural areas | 60% |
| Responses from the clients |
| |
| 1 | Lowers per-visit cost since community health workers are flexible | 98% |
| 2 | Clients are able to choose a preferred care provider. | 75% |
| 3 | Saves time for going to the facilities some of which are very far away | 100% |