						Justice aspect(s) implied
Author/date	Journal	Quality	Context	Policy type	Study type	Recognition	Procedure	distribution
Abrell et al., 2018	Environmental economics and management IF: 4.6	High	USA	Carbon tax	Quantitative analysis through theoretical and numerical general equilibrium analysis			P
Agostini and Jimenez, 2015	Energy economics IF: 12.8	High	Chile	Gasoline tax	Statistical analysis through Suites Index on household budget survey data			P
Bailey, 2017	Annals of the American association of geographers IF: 4.557	Good	Australia	Carbon pricing	Document analysis, semi-structured interviews	P		P
Baranzini et al., 2017	WIREs Climate change IF: 9.2	High	-	Carbon pricing	Review		P	P
Barrington- Leigh et al., 2015	Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques IF: 3.235	Good	Quebec, Canada	Cap-and- Trade	Quantitative analysis through integrated assessment model	P		P
Bendlin, 2014	Cambridge review of international affairs IF: 2.492	High	-	Mitigation policies	Opinion through the lens of women’s right perspective	P	P	P
Bennear, 2022	Annual review of resource economics IF: 5.8	Good	USA	Decarbonization and energy transformation policies	Literature review	P		P
Berry, 2019	Energy policy IF: 9	High	France	Carbon tax	Tax simulation through microsimulation model			P
Boyce, 2018	Ecological economics IF: 7	High	-	Carbon pricing	Review			P
Bubna-Litic and Chalifour, 2012	Dalhousie law journal IF: -	High	Canada and Australia	Carbon taxation and emissions trading	Case study review through a fairness framework	P	P	P
Büchs et al., 2011	Critical social policy IF: 2.3	Good	-	Economic instruments including carbon pricing	Literature review	P		P
Büchs et al., 2021	Environmental research letters IF: 6.7	Good	27 European countries	Carbon taxation	Microsimulation using input-output data			P
Büchs and Schnepf, 2013	Ecological economics IF: 7	High	U.K.	Mitigation policies including carbon taxation	Bivariate analysis and multivariate OLS regression using expenditure survey data	P		P
Caron et al., 2018	Climate change economics IF: 2.3	Good	USA	CO₂ tax	General equilibrium model			P
Chalifour, 2010	Canadian journal women and the law IF: -	High	Canada	Carbon taxation	Case study review from a feminist perspective	P	P	P
Datta, 2010	Energy economics IF: 12.8	High	India	Fuel tax	Input-output analysis of household survey data			P
Dorband et al., 2019	World development IF: 6.9	High	87 lower- and middle- income countries	carbon pricing	Microsimulation using household expenditure data		P	P
Driscoll, 2021	Social problems IF: 3.2	High	France	Carbon taxation	In-depth interviews, document analysis		P
Eisner et al., 2021	Energy policy IF: 9	High	Austria	Carbon tax	EASI (Exact Affine Stone Index) demand system model	P		P
Farrell, 2017	Ecological economics IF: 7	High	Ireland	Carbon taxation	Concentration index methodology, multivariate decomposition			P
Finley-Brook and Holloman, 2016	International journal of environmental research and public health IF: 4.614	Good	USA	Carbon taxation	Literature review		P	P
Frondel and Schubert, 2021	Energy policy IF: 9	High	Germany	Emissions trading	Partial equilibrium model			P
Gago et al., 2021	Hacienda publica Espanola- Review of public economics IF: 0.7	Good	Spain	Energy- environmental tax	Tax effects simulations	P	P	P
Goddard and Farrelly, 2018	Applied energy IF: 11.2	High	Australia	Transitioning power sector into renewable energy	Document analysis		P	P
Green and Gambhir, 2020	Climate policy IF: 6.056	High	-	Low-carbon transition	Literature review			P
Gulbrandsen et al., 2019	Climate policy IF: 6.056	High	-	Carbon markets	Literature review		P
Hänsel et al., 2022	Environmental economics and management IF: 4.6	Good	Germany	Carbon taxation	Welfare-theoretic model of optimal taxation and redistribution			P
Hansford and McKerchar, 2010	eJournal of tax research IF: -	Good	-	Environmental taxation	“is-ought” philosophical framework		P	P
Johnson et al., 2020	Energy research and social science IF: 6.7	Good	Multiple countries including developed and developing	Low-carbon energy	Systematic literature review	P	P	P
Jorgenson et al., 2018	Climate change economics IF: 2.3	Good	USA	Carbon taxation	Inter temporal general equilibrium model			P
Karlsson et al., 2018	Peasant studies IF: 5.333	High	-	Climate-smart agriculture	Document analysis	P	P	P
Klenert et al., 2018	Nature climate change IF: 28.862	High	-	Carbon pricing	Perspective			P
Köppl and Schratzenstaller, 2022	Economic surveys IF: 2.299	Good	-	Carbon taxation	Literature review			P
Lewis et al., 2020	Energy efficiency IF: 3.1	Good	USA	Energy efficiency	Literature review	P		P
Mathur et al., 2013	Climate policy IF: 6.056	High	African and Asian countries	Carbon market	Literature review	P	P	P
O’Beirne et al., 2020	Environmental science and policy IF: 6	High	UK	Greenhouse gas removal (GGR)	Document analysis and interviews		P
Pereira and Pereira, 2019	Green finance IF: 8.6	Good	Portugal	Carbon tax	Dynamic multi- sector general equilibrium model			P
Pitkanen et al., 2022	Ecological economics IF: 7	High	Finland	Personal carbon trading in mobility	Factor analysis and regression Analysis of questionnaire survey data			P
Ravigne et al., 2022	Ecological economics IF: 7	High	France	Low carbon strategy	Combined microsimulation and macroeconomic modelling	P		P
Renner, 2018	Energy policy IF: 9	High	Mexico	Carbon tax	Input-output analysis of household survey data			P
Robinson and Shine, 2018	Nature climate change IF: 28.862	High	-	-	Expert opinion	P	P	P
Sommer et al., 2022	Ecological economics IF: 7	High	Germany	Environmental taxation	Stated choice experiment			P
Sovacool et al., 2019	Climatic change IF: 4.8	High	Four E.U. countries	Low carbon transitions	Mixed methods: interviews, focus groups, forum data	P	P	P
Tank, 2020	Applied philosophy IF: 1.104	Good	-	Carbon pricing	Opinion through Moral argument of “Unfair Burdens”			P
Teixidó and Verde, 2017	Ecological economics IF: 7	High	USA	Gasoline tax	Statistical matching using household-level data			P
Walker and Day, 2012	Energy policy IF: 9	High	U.K.	Fuel poverty policy	Literature review	P	P	P
Wang et al., 2016	Applied energy IF: 11.2	High	-	Carbon taxation	Literature review			P
Wilson, 2011	Ecological law quarterly IF: -	High	-	Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)	Empirical critique		P
Yusuf and Resosudarmo, 2015	Environmental economics and policy studies IF: 1.7	Good	Indonesia	Carbon tax	Computational general equilibrium modelling			P
Zhao et al., 2022	Sustainability science IF: 6	High	China	Carbon tax	Integrated assessment model			P