Study

Handgrip measurement

Position

Hand

Handgrip strength results

RT group compared to control group

Aragão-Santos et al. (2020)

Not clearly reported

Sitting position at a 90˚ elbow flexion position

Left

Right

EBFT: ↔

TSBFT: ↑

CON: ↓

No significant between-group differences.

-

Bårdstu et al. (2020)

Handheld dynamometer (Baseline® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer, Elmsford, NY, USA)

Not clearly reported

Preferred arm

RT: ↔

CON: ↔

No significant between-group differences.

-

Bezerra et al. (2018)

Hand dynamometer (Saehan Corporation®, 973, Yangdeok-Dong, Masan, Korea)

Sitting position at a 90˚ elbow flexion position

Left

Right

MJ: ↑

MJ+SJ: ↑

CON: ↔

No significant group effect. No significant group × time interaction.

-

Bunout et al. (2004)

Hand grip dynamometer (Therapeutic Instruments, Clifton NJ, USA)

Not clearly reported

Left

Right

Right hand:

NE: ↑

NN (CON): ↔

No significant between-group differences.

Left hand:

NE: ↑

NN (CON): ↔

No significant between-group differences.

↔↔

Bunout et al. (2005)

Hand grip dynamometer (Therapeutic Instruments, Clifton NJ, USA)

Not clearly reported

Dominant

RT: ↔

CON: ↔

No significant between-group differences.

-

Campa et al. (2021)

Dynamometer (Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Niigata, Japan)

Sitting position at a 90˚ elbow flexion position

Dominant

ST: ↑

TT: ↔

CON: ↓

Significant group × time interaction.

-

Campa et al. (2018)

Dynamometer (Takei K.K. 5001, Takei Scientific Instruments Ltd., Niigata, Japan)

Sitting position at a 90˚ elbow flexion position

Dominant

ST: ↑

CON: ↓

Significant group by time interaction.

-

?

Chupel et al. (2017)

Dynamometer (Lafayette, 78010, Indiana, USA)

Standing position with the elbow at the side of the body

Left

Right

RT: ↑

CON: ↔

Significant difference between groups.

-

de Vreede et al. (2005)

Handgrip dynamometer (Takei Kiki Kogyo 5101, Tokyo, Japan)

Not clearly reported

Left

Right

RT: ↔ FT: ↔

CON: ↔

No significant between-group differences.

-

Gylling et al. (2020)

SAEHAN DHD-1 Digital Hand Dynamometer

Not clearly reported

Not clearly reported

Heavy RT: ↔

Moderate RT: ↔

CON: ↔

No significant group × time interaction.

-

Pereira et al. (2012)

Hand dynamometer (Lafayette Instrument, Lafayette, IN)

Sitting position at a 90˚ elbow flexion position

Dominant

Non-dominant

Dominant hand:

RT: ↑

CON: ↔

No significant between-group differences.

Non-dominant hand:

RT: ↑

CON: ↔

Significant between-group differences.

↔↑

Rhodes et al. (2000)

Hand dynamometer

Not clearly reported

Dominant

RT: ↔

CON: ↔

No significant between-group differences.

-

Richardson et al. (2019)

Digital strain-gauge dynamometer (Takei TKK 5401, Takei Scientific Instruments, Tokyo, Japan)

Not clearly reported

Dominant

Non-dominant

Dominant hand:

HVLL1: ↔

HVLL2: ↔

LVHL1: ↔

LVHL2: ↔

CON: ↔

No significant between-group differences.

Non-dominant hand:

HVLL1: ↔

HVLL2: ↔

LVHL1: ↔

LVHL2: ↑

CON: ↔

Significant difference between LVHL2 and CON.

↔↔

↔↔

↔↔

↔↑

Rogers et al. (2002)

Handgrip dynamometer (Jamar, Inc.)

Not clearly reported

Not clearly reported

RT: ↑

CON: ↔

Between group statistics were not clearly reported.

-

?

Skelton et al. (1995)

Not clearly reported

Not clearly reported

Left

Right

RT: ↑ CON: ↔

Significant between-group differences.

-

Thomas et al. (2008)

Grippit®

dynamometer (AB Detector, Gothenburg, Sweden)

Sitting position at a 90˚ elbow flexion position

Left

Right

Right hand

RT: ↑ CON: ↔

Significant between-group differences.

Left hand

RT: ↔

CON: ↔

No significant between-group differences

↑↔

Tieland et al. (2015)

Hydraulic hand dynamometer (Jamar, Jackson, MI, USA)

Sitting position with the arm in a 90˚ angle position

Dominant

Non-dominant

Dominant hand

RT: ↑

CON: ↑

Significant time effect. No significant group effect. No significant group × time interaction.

Non-dominant hand

RT: ↑

CON: ↑

Significant time effect. No significant group effect. No significant group × time interaction.

↔↔

Tsuzuku et al. (2018)

Hand grip dynamometer (Grip-D; Takei Instruments, Niigata, Japan)

Standing position

Right

RT: ↔ CON: ↔

No significant between-group differences

-

Vezzoli et al. (2019)

Dynamometer (JAMAR PLUS+, Sammors Preston, Rolyon, Bolingbrook, IL, USA)

Standing position, the upper limbs along the sides, and the legs slightly apart

Left

Right

RT: ↔ CON: ↔

No significant between-group differences

-

Wanderley et al. (2015)

Handgrip dynamometer (Takei, TKK 5101 Grip-D)

Held the dynamometer in the dominant hand with his/her arm by his/her side and had to squeeze using maximum force

Dominant

RT: ↔ CON: ↔

No significant group × time interaction.

-