Author | Year | Period | Type of study | Vascular Technique | Type of patients: Diabetics (D), All pathologies | Ischemic stage | Treated limbs | Follow-up (months) | Clinical benefit of DR versus IR (p) - Healing (H) - Limb Salvage (LS) |
Attinger | 2006 | - | Retrospective | Surgery | D. | Diabetic wounds Rutherford 5, 6. | 56 | 6 | p = 0.0095 (H) p = 0.016 (LS) |
Neville | 2009 | - | Retrospective | Surgery | All pathologies | TP < 50, ischemic wounds | 52 | 24 | p = 0.03 (LS) |
Varela | 2010 | 2005-2008 | Retrospective | Surgery + Endovascular | All pathologies | TP< 50, ischemic wounds | 76 | 24 | p = 0.008 (H) p = 0.02 (LS) |
Iida | 2012 | 2004-2010 | Retrospective | Endovascular | All pathologies | TP < 50, ischemic wounds | 326 | 48 | p = 0.002 (H) p = 0.03 (LS) |
Blanes | 2011 | - | Retrospective | Endovascular | All pathologies | Rutherford 5, 6. | 34 | 21 | P > 0.05 P > 0.05 |
Alexandrescu | 2011 | 2001-2010 | Retrospective | Endovascular | D. | Diabetic wounds Rutherford 5, 6. | 232 | 54 | p = 0.018 (H) p = 0.030 (LS) |
Azuma | 2012 | 2003-2009 | Retrospective | Surgery | All pathologies | Rutherford 5, 6. | 96 | 24 | p = 0.185 (H) |
Lejay | 2013 | 2003-2009 | Retrospective | Surgery | D. | Diabetic wounds Rutherford 5, 6 | 58 | 12 | p = 0.01 (H) p = 0.003 (LS) |
Kabra | 2013 | 2007-2008 | Prospective | Surgery + Endovascular | All pathologies | Rutherford 4-6. | 64 | 6 | p = 0.021 (H) p = 0.06 |
Söderström | 2013 | 2007-2011 | Retrospective | Endovascular |
D. | Diabetic wounds Rutherford 5, 6. | 168 | 12 | p = 0.001 (H) |
Jeon | 2016 | 2011-2013 | Retrospective | Surgery | D. | Diabetic wounds Rutherford 5, 6. | 82 | 13 | P < 0.05 (H) |
Elbadawi | 2018 | 2014-2016 | Prospective | Endovascular | All pathologies | Rutherford 5, 6. | 212 | 12 | p = 0.02 (H) p = 0.148 (LS) |