No

ID

Effect parameter

Correction structure

BIC

logLik

Test

L. ratio

p-value

Pinus montezumae

1

3.9.0

$a_1$

Without structure

3602.1

−1784.1

2

$a_2$

3596.0

−1781.1

3

$a_1\text{y}{a}_2$

3608.0

−1780.3

2 vs 3

1.55

0.4596

4

3.9.1

$a_1$

varPower

3532.8

−1746.1

2 vs 4

69.96

<0.0001

5

$a_2$

3515.7

−1737.5

6

3.9.2

$a_1$

varExp

3545.6

−1752.5

7

$a_2$

3532.6

−1745.9

8

$a_{1}y{a}_2$

3522.4

−1734.0

5 vs 8

6.88

0.032

9

3.9.3

$a_1$

varConstPower

3539.6

−1746.1

8 vs 9

24.06

<0.0001

10

$a_2$

3522.5

−1737.5

8 vs 10

6.89

0.0087

11

$a_1\text{y}{a}_2$

3525.7

−1735.8

Pinus pseuodstrobus

1

3.9.0

$a_1$

Without structure

5910.1

−2937.1

2

$a_2$

5926.9

−2945.6

3

$a_1\text{y}{a}_2$

5918.2

−2934.0

1 vs 3

6.206

0.0449

4

3.9.1

$a_1$

varPower

5684.0

−2820.6

3 vs 4

227

<0.0001

5

$a_2$

5712.4

−2834.7

6

$a_1\text{y}{a}_2$

5681.2

−2812.0

4 vs 6

17.15

<0.0001

7

3.9.2

$a_1$

varExp

5751.1

−2854.1

6 vs 7

84.21

<0.0001

8

$a_2$

5774.0

−2865.5

6 vs 8

107.1

<0.0001

9

$a_{1}y{a}_2$

5748.9

−2845.8

10

3.9.3

$a_1$

varConstPower

5691.2

−2820.6

9 vs 10

50.58

<0.0001

11

$a_2$

5719.5

−2834.7

9 vs 11

22.26

<0.0001

12

$a_1\text{y}{a}_2$

5688.4

−2812.0

9 vs 12

67.73

<0.0001