STUDY AUTHORS

APPLICATION OF TREATMENT

INTERFERENCE METHOD

SAMPLE/ DESIGN

SIGNIFICANT FINDING

OTHER OUTCOMES/NOTES

Won, M et al. 2012

Emotion management skills

I hour training on emotion management has. been applied for 2 months

The statistics were gathered from twenty two patients in intervention group &thirty in corresponding group

The intervention cluster demonstrate a considerable distinction in social relationship scores, emotional behavior & expression and social behavior scores than those in the corresponding group.

I hour training on emotion management for schizophrenic patients serving as resourceful evidence-based care to the patients during the course of intervention

Sachs, G et al. (2012)

Study the effects of a on affect recognition (TAR) computer-based training of emotion recognition and mainly on life quality & features

1.5 month teaching on emotions recognizing

prior & after intervention evaluation of affect recognizing life quality, cognition, and symptoms presentation were examined

An assessment was done before & after intervention regarding recognizing of different emotions, patients’ life quality and clinical condition. Results show considerable progress especially in recognize gloomy faces and, in addition, in the quality of life area social connection.

The result sustain the effectiveness of emotion recognition teaching for clients with schizophrenia & the generality to societal connection

Peters MJ (2013)

Examined effect of emotionality on remembrance and meta-memory by means of videotape succession

27 clients and twenty four corresponding were given a recently created emotional videotape prototype with 5 diverse emotions including negative, positive, neutral and delusional themes.

pre- and post-treatment assessments

Following watching video, subject rating their confidence, naming emotions to create their judgment along with ratings, examine remembrance correctness and meta-memory insufficiency in more interacting context

Almost all patients confidently valenced video, patients recognized less right items contrast to corresponding subject, and did not vary with regard to the amount of false memories for related items.