Project Identification

N

SD (%)

D (%)

N (%)

A (%)

SA (%)

Me

Std. Er

SD

a

Stakeholders were involved in problem analysis and needs assessment

376

0.5

17.6

49.7

32.2

0

3.1

0.037

0.708

b

Stakeholders were able to suggest various options to solve the problem identified before settling one

376

5.3

23.7

46.8

24.2

0

2.9

0.043

0.826

c

Participatory project identification, was/would be the best solution to solve the problem of water shortage

376

7.4

19.9

25.8

32.2

14.6

3.3

0.060

1.156

d

Project sustainability is an important consideration during project identification

376

3.7

22.6

20.2

37.0

16.5

3.4

0.058

1.117

e

Community leaders held meetings with the beneficiaries to suggest projects

376

5.4

20.6

57.2

15.0

1.8

2.9

0.042

0.821

f

Beneficiaries were allowed to compare different projects

376

4.2

18.0

70.2

7.6

0

2.9

0.044

0.844

g

Stakeholders agreed on the project to be shortlisted

376

5.8

20.8

64.4

5.2

3.8

2.8

0.047

0.911

h

Beneficiaries expressed all the needs to be solved by suggested projects

376

10.2

20.6

58.2

8.6

2.4

2.8

0.054

1.042

i

Political leaders sat with beneficiaries during needs assessment

376

8.9

20.8

46.2

17.4

6.7

2.9

0.041

0.792

j

Political and community leaders-imposed projects on the beneficiaries

376

3.8

12.3

46.8

20.7

16.4

3.3

0.049

0.941

Valid N (listwise)

376

Composite Mean Score and Standard Deviation

3.03

0.9518