| Treatment | Control | Coefficient | Std. Err. | R-square |
| Hong Kong | Singapore | 1.033*** | 0.105 | 0.9937 |
| Italy | 0.017 | 0.049 | ||
| U.S.A | −0.557*** | 0.163 | ||
| Macao | Singapore | 2.039*** | 0.221 | 0.9974 |
| Italy | 2.967*** | 0.463 | ||
| The Republic of Korea | −0.202** | 0.075 | ||
| Netherlands | −2.555*** | 0.511 | ||
| Guangzhou | Jieyang | −0.480*** | 0.096 | 0.9992 |
| Chaozhou | 0.872*** | 0.204 | ||
| Qingyuan | −0.441*** | 0.061 | ||
| Shaoguang | 1.399*** | 0.142 | ||
| Shenzhen | Jieyang | −0.839*** | 0.141 | 0.9986 |
| Chaozhou | 1.378*** | 0.299 | ||
| Qingyuan | −0.789*** | 0.090 | ||
| Shaoguang | 1.829*** | 0.208 | ||
| Zhuhai | Qingyuan | −0.403*** | 0.074 | 0.9979 |
| Shaoguang | 1.642*** | 0.097 | ||
| Foshan | Jieyang | −0.214*** | 0.057 | 0.9996 |
| Shaoguang | 1.051*** | 0.078 | ||
| Zhanjiang | 0.483*** | 0.092 | ||
| Huizhou | Yangjiang | 0.733*** | 0.085 | 0.9992 |
| Shanwei | 0.312*** | 0.093 | ||
| Dongguang | Jieyang | −1.320*** | 0.137 | 0.9979 |
| Shaoguang | 0.821*** | 0.218 | ||
| Shanwei | 1.714*** | 0.241 | ||
| Zhongshan | Jieyang | −0.919*** | 0.162 | 0.998 |
| Chaozhou | 1.017** | 0.378 | ||
| Shaoguang | 1.229*** | 0.246 | ||
| Jiangmen | Qingyuan | 0.388*** | 0.023 | 0.9993 |
| Shanwei | 0.353*** | 0.031 | ||
| Zhaoqing | Jieyang | 0.499*** | 0.038 | 0.9998 |
| Chaozhou | 1.007*** | 0.125 | ||
| Zhanjiang | −0.934*** | 0.095 | ||
| Yangjiang | 1.701*** | 0.109 | ||
| Shanwei | −1.100*** | 0.081 |