Evaluation of success correctness or incorrectness of planning				Evaluation of success correctness or incorrectness based on the planned value and actual value of project that specifications change did not occur during development
121_ Planning of Quality	122_Planning of Delivery	120_Planning of Cost	Judge	124_Actual result of Quality	Judge	125_Actual result of Delivery	Judge	123_Actual result of Cost	Judge
x = 1.0: Target of Quality is clear and feasibility has been examined.	y = 1.0: Grounds of delivery time is clear and feasibility has been examined.	z = 1.0: Grounds of cost is clear and feasibility has been examined.	R	x = 1.2: Fewer than planned value more than 20% (0 ≤ x ≤ 80)	E	y = 1.2: Earlier than delivery time. (y < Planned Delivery time)	E	z = 1.2: Accomplished with cost that is lower than 20% of planned value. (0 ≤ z ≤ 90)	E
				x = 1.0: Fewer than planned value. (80 < x ≤ 100)	R	y = 1.0:According to Delivery time (y = Planned Delivery time)	R	z = 1.0: According to planned value. (Less than ±10%) (90 < z < 110)	R
				x = 0.8: Excess within 50% of planned value. (100 < x ≤ 150)	W	y = 0.8: Less than 10 days late on Delivery time. (Planned Delivery time < y < Planned Delivery time +10)	W	z = 0.8: Excess within 30% of planed value. (110 ≤ z ≤ 130)	W
				x = 0.6: Excess within 100% of planned value. (150 < x ≤ 200)		y = 0.6: Less than 30 days late on Delivery time. (Planned Delivery time +10 ≤ y< Planned Delivery time +30)		z = 0.6: Excess within 50% of planned value. (130
				x = 0.2: Excess more than 100% of planned value. (200 < x)		y = 0.2: More than 30 days late on Delivery time. (Planned Delivery time +30 ≤ y)		z = 0.2: Excess more than 50% of planned value. (150 < z)
x = 0.0: Quality target is not clear or feasibility is not examined.	y = 0.0: Grounds of the time of delivery plan are not clear and feasibility is not examined.	z = 0.0: Grounds of the cost calculation are not clear or feasibility is not examined.	W	---------	I	---------	I	---------	I
x, y or z = 0.0: No planning			W		I		I		I