| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
| Less devastation vs. no or partial damage | |||
| Ref. category—most vulnerable to livelihood insecurity after climatic shock | |||
| Medium insecure livelihood after climatic shock | 1.09 | 2.78 | 2.46 |
| Least insecure livelihood after climatic shock | 0.10*** | 0.40 | 0.45 |
| Ref. category—influence of accessibility hamper after climatic shock with ref. category—most difficult to access | |||
| Moderate difficult to access |
| 0.43 | 0.16* |
| Less difficult to access |
| 0.03*** | 0.01*** |
| Ref. category—poor with severe consumption sacrifice | |||
| Moderate poor with moderate consumption sacrifice | 0.33 | ||
| Less poor with moderate consumption sacrifice | 0.10** | ||
| Mostly devastated vs. no or partial damage | |||
| Ref. category—most vulnerable to livelihood insecurity after climatic shock | |||
| Medium insecure livelihood after climatic shock | 1.55 | 2.12 | 2.13 |
| Least insecure livelihood after climatic shock | 0.53 | 0.84 | 0.78 |
| Ref. category—influence of accessibility hamper after climatic shock with ref. category—most difficult to access | |||
| Moderate difficult to access |
| 0.42 | 0.18* |
| Less difficult to access | 0.33 | 0.09** | |
| Ref. category—poor with severe consumption sacrifice | |||
| Moderate poor with moderate consumption sacrifice | 0.65 | ||
| Less poor with moderate consumption sacrifice |
| 0.15** | |
| Number of observations | 267 | 258 | 233 |
| Wald chi2 | 17.99 | 33.21 | 41.28 |
| Prob > chi2 | 0.0012 | 0.0001 | 0.0000 |
| Pseudo R2 | 0.0497 | 0.1051 | 0.1386 |