Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
Less devastation vs. no or partial damage | |||
Ref. category—most vulnerable to livelihood insecurity after climatic shock | |||
Medium insecure livelihood after climatic shock | 1.09 | 2.78 | 2.46 |
Least insecure livelihood after climatic shock | 0.10*** | 0.40 | 0.45 |
Ref. category—influence of accessibility hamper after climatic shock with ref. category—most difficult to access | |||
Moderate difficult to access |
| 0.43 | 0.16* |
Less difficult to access |
| 0.03*** | 0.01*** |
Ref. category—poor with severe consumption sacrifice | |||
Moderate poor with moderate consumption sacrifice | 0.33 | ||
Less poor with moderate consumption sacrifice | 0.10** | ||
Mostly devastated vs. no or partial damage | |||
Ref. category—most vulnerable to livelihood insecurity after climatic shock | |||
Medium insecure livelihood after climatic shock | 1.55 | 2.12 | 2.13 |
Least insecure livelihood after climatic shock | 0.53 | 0.84 | 0.78 |
Ref. category—influence of accessibility hamper after climatic shock with ref. category—most difficult to access | |||
Moderate difficult to access |
| 0.42 | 0.18* |
Less difficult to access | 0.33 | 0.09** | |
Ref. category—poor with severe consumption sacrifice | |||
Moderate poor with moderate consumption sacrifice | 0.65 | ||
Less poor with moderate consumption sacrifice |
| 0.15** | |
Number of observations | 267 | 258 | 233 |
Wald chi2 | 17.99 | 33.21 | 41.28 |
Prob > chi2 | 0.0012 | 0.0001 | 0.0000 |
Pseudo R2 | 0.0497 | 0.1051 | 0.1386 |