Study | TP | FP | FN | TN | Cutoff value | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | AUROC (95% CI) |
Barbier et al. 2004 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 18% | 90.00 | 90% | 0.91 (0.84, 0.98) |
Feissel et al. 2004 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 12% | - | - | - |
Moretti and Pizzi 2010 | 12 | 0 | 5 | 12 | 16% | 70.59% | 100% | 0.902 (0.733, 0.979) |
Deok et al. 2010 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.85 (0.69, 1.00) |
Machare-Delgado 2011 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 | 12% | 100.00 | 53% | 0.81 (0.64, 0.99) |
Corl et al. 2012 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.46 (0.21, 0.71) |
Muller et al. 2012 | 14 | 4 | 6 | 16 | 40% | 70 | 80% | 0.77 (0.60, 0.88) |
Brun et al. 2013 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.57 (0.32, 0.82) |
Byon HJ 2013 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.369 (0.156, 0.582) |
Baker et al. 2013 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.46 (0.22 - 0.69) |
Lanspa et al. 2013 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 15% | 100 | 66.66% | 0.83 (0.58 - 1.0) |
Charbonneau et al. 2014 | 10 | 7 | 16 | 11 | 21% | 38 | 61% | 0.43 (0.25, 0.61) |
de Valk et al. 2014 | 10 | 11 | 2 | 22 | 36.5 | 83 | 67% | 0.741 |
Sobczyk et al. 2015 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Lujan, varas et al. 2015 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 18% | - | - | - |
Airapetian et al. 2015 | 9 | 1 | 20 | 29 | 42% | 31 | 97% | 0.62 ± 0.07 (0.49 - 0.74) |
Weber et al. 2015 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.502 (0.29, 0.71) |
Achar et al. 2016 | 22 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 23.5% | 91 | 89% | 0.94 |
Sobczyk et al. 2016 | 20 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 18%- | 82.35%- | 72.72%- | 0.739 |
de Oliveira et al. 2016 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 16% | 66.67 | 100% | 0.84 ± 0.10 (0.63 - 1.0) |