Pain and brain

References

Infants remember NMC pain only when no anesthesia is used, leading to anesthesia being recommended

Taddio et al. [133]

No evidence of lasting brain changes, nor psychological trauma in neonatally circumcised men

Ullmann et al. [171]

No psychological problems among Swedish schoolboys circumcised for phimosis, apart from “shyness and unwillingness to undress in school gym”

Stenram et al. [173] [174]

A report of an “after-hours” MRI claiming brain changes from NMC was likely a fabrication

Schaab [176]

UK longitudinal study of >5000 males followed from birth to age 27 found no difference in developmental and behavioural indices between the circumcised and uncircumcised

Calnan et al. [172]

New Zealand longitudinal studies found no difference in psychological outcomes between neonatally circumcised and uncircumcised males

Fergusson et al. [142] [143] , Moreton [144]

A study claiming MC causes alexithymia was fundamentally flawed

Morris & Waskett [145]

Body dysmorphic disorder has been linked to alexithymia

Fenwick & Sullivan [147]

Alexithymia is likely a stable personality trait not simply a consequence of psychological distress

Taylor et al. [148]

Psychological harm may stem from anti-MC (intactivist) influence not NMC

Circumcision Choice [153]

“Foreskin restoration”

References

Various psychological disorders [158] [159] are more common in those circumcised men who are preoccupied by their absent foreskin

Mohl et al. [146]

One of these may be partialism, which is an “exclusive focus on a part of the body”

Kafka [159] ,

American Psychiatric Association DSM-5 [158]

Partialism is linked to alexithymia

Fenwick & Sullivan [147]

Men preoccupied with their absent foreskin represent a subgroup within the MSM community

Mohl et al. [146]

Legal, ethical & human rights arguments opposing MC

References

These arguments are contradicted by expert evaluations

Rivin et al. [23] , Morris et al. [24] , Benatar & Benatar [44] [45] , Bates et al. [46] , Benatar [47] , Jacobs [48] , Jacobs & Arora [49] , Bester [50]

The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child supports the rights of the child to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health

United Nations Human Rights Office [178]

Since benefits greatly exceed risks, it would be unethical to leave boys uncircumcised

Bates et al. [46] , Jacobs [48]

Children have the right to preventive health care

Rivin et al. [23]

Arguments opposing MC on the basis of “autonomy” have been refuted by ethicists

Benatar [47] , Jacobs [48] , Jacobs & Arora [49] , Bester [50] , Clark et al. [179] , Mazor [180]

Being circumcised boosts autonomy more than constraining it

Brusa & Barilan [181]

The Hippocratic Oath contains the statement, “I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure”

Johns Hopkins University [187]

The nature and consequences of “intactivism”

References

Suicides have been reported for circumcised men who developed psychological problems after succumbing to anti-MC rhetoric that their NMC had deprived them of a fulfilling sex life

Bay Area Intactivists [194] , Intaction [195]

Anti-vaccination proponents are more likely to be anti-MC and anti-water fluoridation

Hoffman et al. [163]