No.

Study/Article

Participants

Methods

Results

1.

DiStefano et al. [12]

Year: 2013

Country: USA

Types of study: Retrospectives

Participants: Young Adults/Parents

Number: 95

Male: Not Stated

Female: Not Stated

Age: Not Stated

Data Collection Tools: unknown

Sampling methods: unknown

Place: Community based

Barriers

1. Trust

2. Religion cultural taboo

3. Fear

2.

Kang et al. [37]

Year: 2006

Country: USA

Type of Study: Cross sectional

Participants: HIV + API

Number: 44

Male: 36

Age: 31 - 60 yrs

Mean Age: 44, SD: 7.94

Female: 5

Age: 36 - 67 yrs

Mean age: 45, SD: 12.82

Transgender: 1

Age: 47

Data Collection Tools: Interview

Sampling Method: Non-random convenience sample

Place: Community based

Barrier

1. Stigma

3.

Kennedy et al. [10]

Year: 2013

Country: Vanuatu

Type of Study: Qualitative

Participants: Adolescents, Policy makers & service providers

Number: 341

Male: 169

Female: 172

Age: 15 - 19 yrs.

Data collection Tools: Focus group, Interview

Sampling Method: Purposive sample

Place: Community based

Barriers

1. Culture

2. Taboos

3. Lack of confidentiality

4. Lack of Knowledge

4.

Lee and Rotheram?Borus, [45]

Year: 2009

Country: USA

Type of study: Cohort

Participants: students

Number: 13233

Female: Not Stated

Male: Not Stated

Age: below 14 to 18+

Data Collection Tools: Questionnaire

Sampling Methods: Random sample

Place: School Based

Barriers

1. Parental communication

5.

Han, [46]

Year: 2009

Country: USA

Type of study: Descriptive

Participants: Gay, Bisexual & Queer Asian Pacific Islander Men

Number: 15

Male: 15

Female: Not stated

Age 18 - 50+

Data Collection Tools: Focus group, Interview

Sampling Method: Convenience Sampling

Place: Community based

Barrier

1. Racism

2. Homophobia

3. Low self esteem

4. Negative role model

6.

DiStefano et al. [47]

Year: 2012

Country: USA

Type of study: Descriptive

Participants: Young adults, Parents, Health workers

Number: 95

Female: Not Stated

Male: Not Stated

Data Collection Tools: Focus group, Interview

Sampling Method: Purposive

Place: Community based

Barrier

1. Misinformation

2. Communication

3. Perceptions

4. Family shame

5. Privacy

6. Gender

7. Parents role

8. Religion

7.

Linh et al. [48]

Year: 2015

Country: Vietnam

Type of Study: Case design study

Participants: Government officials, Health workers, business members, civil society leaders

Number: 20

Female: Not Stated

Male: Not Stated

Age: Not Stated

Data Collection Tools: Interview

Sampling Method: Snowball

Place: Population base

Barrier

1. Cost

2. Overprotected owner rights