Author (Year)

Country

Type of Study

Number of Participants

Type of Surgery Investigated

Type of Telemedicine Intervention Utilized

Statistical

Significance

Timmers (2019)

Netherlands

RCT

213

Orthopedic

Curated app

p = 0.001 (rest), p < 0.001 (during activity), p = 0.003 (at night)

Eichler (2019)

Germany

RCT

111

Orthopedic

Text messaging, video chat

p = 0.001

Russell (2011)

Australia

RCT

65

Orthopedic

Video chat

p ≤ 0.01

Piqueras (2013)

Spain

RCT

142

Orthopedic

Video chat

p = 0.284

Moffet (2015)

Canada

RCT

205

Orthopedic

Video chat

Control: 82.8 ± 1.4

Exp: 84.0 ± 1.4

Herrero (2021)

USA

RCT

150

Orthopedic

Video chat

p = 0.668

Kane (2020)

USA

RCT

58

Orthopedic

Video chat

p = 0.638 (2 wks post-op), p = 0.124 (6 wks post-op), p = 0.951 (12 wks post-op)

Sandhu (2021)

India

Prospective observational

50

Orthopedic

Phone call

N/A*

Coronado (2020)

USA

RCT

8

Orthopedic

Phone call

N/A*

Anthony (2018)

USA

Multicenter study

82

Orthopedic

Text messaging

p = 0.04 (pain), p = 0.004 (# opioid tablets)

Iwanoff (2018)

USA

Controlled clinical trial

459

Urology/Gynecology

Phone call

p = 0.13 (pain), p = 0.04 (# of calls)

Thompson (2019)

USA

RCT

100

Urology/Gynecology

Phone call

p = 0.30 (rest), p = 0.47 (normal activity), p = 0.30 (exercise), p = 0.47 (worst pain today)

Vonk Noordegraaf (2014)

Netherlands

RCT

215

Urology/Gynecology

Curated program

p = 0.035

Finkelstein (2020)

USA

Prospective cohort

N/A*

Urology/Gynecology

Video chat

p = 0.11

McGillion (2021)

Canada

RCT

905

General, Non-Elective

Video chat

p < 0.001 (7 days), p < 0.001 (15 days), p < 0.008 (30 days)

Cleeland (2011)

USA

RCT

100

Oncology

Email

p = 0.02

Lafaro (2020)

USA

Pilot study

34

Oncology

Video chat

p = 0.001 (GI cancer); p = 0.01 (lung cancer)