Relationship | Site | Statistical analysis | Results | P | F | |
I-P | All (N = 142) | Communication style and SA | Chi-square | X2 = 0.955, df = 2 | 0.62 | |
Safety content (supervisor) and SA | T-test | Conservative: N = 114, Mean = 0.6631, SD = 0.29574 | 0.278 | 1.185 | ||
Risky: N = 28, Mean = 0.7196, SD = 0.32167 | ||||||
Group 1 (N = 53) | Communication style and SA | Chi-square | X2 = 0.121, N = 94, df = 2 | 0.941 | ||
Safety content (supervisor) and SA | T-test | Conservative: N = 69, Mean = 0.6539, SD = 0.29130 | 0.145 | 2.155 | ||
Risky: N = 25, Mean = 0.7060, SD = 0.32810 | ||||||
Group 2 (N = 41) | Communication style and SA | Chi-square | X2 = 7.966, N = 53, df = 3 | 0.047 | ||
Safety content (supervisor) and SA | T-test | Conservative: N = 39, Mean = 0.6231, SD = 0.27854 | 0.306 | 1.069 | ||
Risky: N = 14, Mean = 0.7736, SD = 0.33754 | ||||||
Group 3 (N = 48) | Communication style and SA | Chi-square | X2 = 3.2, N = 48, df = 2 | 0.202 | ||
Safety content (supervisor) and SA | T-test | Conservative: N = 45, Mean = 0.6771, SD = 0.30520 | 0.256 | 1.324 | ||
Risky: N = 3, Mean = 0.8333, SD = 0.28868 |