| No. | Evaluation index | Weights | Itemized scoring criteria | |||||
| 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | |||
| 1 | “CDIO project” content meets the syllabus requirements | 5% | √ |
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 | “CDIO project” deepens the understanding of the difficult points of the course | 5% | √ |
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 | “CDIO project” focuses on linking theory with practice, reflecting the development of the discipline | 5% |
| √ |
|
|
|
|
| 4 | The “CDIO project” scheme design is reasonable and feasible | 10% |
| √ |
|
|
|
|
| 5 | “CDIO project” classroom learning atmosphere is active | 15% | √ |
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 | “CDIO project” training hands-on practical ability | 15% | √ |
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 | “CDIO project” trains innovative design ability | 15% | √ |
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 | “CDIO project” realizes the application of theoretical knowledge | 15% |
| √ |
|
|
|
|
| 9 | “CDIO project” focuses on quality education | 5% |
| √ |
|
|
|
|
| 10 | “CDIO project” can improve teaching quality | 10% | √ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall rating | 1 | 9.65 | |||||
|
| Comprehensive level | Excellent | ||||||