Personnel administration by HRIS

Mean Score

Interpretation of findings

Recruitment Application

3.34

The data indicates that the recruitment application process received an average score of 3.34 on a rating scale. The aforementioned statement suggests a moderate degree of effectiveness in relation to HRIS role in recruitment application.

Selection Application

3.40

The mean score for the selection application process has been observed to be marginally higher, with a value of 3.40. This observation suggests that the level of satisfaction or effectiveness in the recruitment application process is comparable, potentially with certain enhancements or a marginally superior outcome.

Job Analysis

3.64

Job Analysis had a mean score of 3.64. The observation of a higher mean score of 3.64 for job analysis suggests that individuals perceive this particular component of the HRIS process to be even more effective.

Performance Appraisal

3.77

The performance appraisal yielded a mean score of 3.77. The mean score for the performance appraisal process is relatively higher, with a value of 3.77. This observation suggests that there is a higher level of satisfaction among employees and stakeholders regarding the evaluation and appraisal of their performance by the HRIS.

Performance Measurement

3.89

The measurement of performance, as indicated by the mean score of 3.89, is a crucial aspect in evaluating and assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of HRIS. Performance measurement appears to be the aspect that has received the most favorable evaluation, as evidenced by its highest mean score of 3.89. This statement implies that the through HRIS, ZESCO has implemented efficient methodologies for quantifying and evaluating performance of staff.