Theme

Sub-Theme

Sub-sub-theme

Item

Informant

1

2

3

4

5

Evaluation of Village Fund Management in improving community welfare

Effectiveness

1. Effect of policy

1

1, 9, 11,

2. Organization

2

4, 7, 8

3. Public participation

3

12, 14

Efficiency

1. Achievement of performance

4

9, 10, 11

2. Achievement of development

5

3, 11, 14

Adequacy

1. Village needs

6

13, 14

2. Public needs

7

11, 14

Equity

1. Village fund

8

5, 9, 11

2. Social welfare

9

6, 12

Responsiveness

1. Effect of problem solving

10

9, 13

2. Priority needs

11

2, 11, 14

Appropriateness

1. Accomplishment of the effect

12

9, 12

2. Purpose of the effect

13

7, 10

Supporting factors:

-External

-Internal

External Supporting

1. Cultural power

14

11, 13

2. Legal power

15

5, 10

3. Government power

16

1, 6

Internal Supporting

1. Organizational leadership

17

9, 11

2. Clarity of program

18

7, 12

3. Personnel knowledge on information

19

12, 13

Inhibiting factors:

-Internal

-External

Internal Inhibiting

1. Low quality of human resources

20

2, 11

2. Limited budget allocation

21

5, 11

3. Limited facilities and infrastructures

22

1, 7

External inhibiting

1. Weak inter-sectoral coordination

23

9, 10

2. Dynamics of community taste

24

6, 11

3. Weak Community-based-organization

25

11, 14

Efforts to overcome inhibiting factors:

-internal

-external

Internal evaluation:

1. Improving quality of human resources

26

2, 11

2. Optimizing the budget

27

5, 11

3. Procurement of facilities and infrastructures

28

1, 7

External evaluation

1. Effective Inter-sectorial coordination

29

9, 10

2. Appropriate response on community taste

30

6, 11

3. Improving the community-based-organization

31

11, 14