Indicators

Mean

Interpretation

1. Commitment of upper administration

3.1333

It indicates that the support to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were not so evident.

2. Commitment of immediate superior

2.7333

It indicates that the support to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were not so evident.

3. Commitment from other areas of the institution

3.1500

It indicates that the support to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were not so evident.

4. Participation by other areas of the institution

3.1167

It indicates that the support to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were not so evident.

5. Support from faculty

3.2333

It indicates that the support to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were not so evident.

6. Financial resources committed directly to the continuous improvement process

2.8000

It indicates that the support to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were not so evident.

7. Staff time to commit to the program

3.2833

It indicates that the support to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were clearly evident.

8. Training in continuous improvement methods for faculty

3.1167

It indicates that the support to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were not so evident.

9. Training in continuous improvement methods for administrators

2.5333

It indicates that the support to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were not so evident.

10. Employees with a general understanding of continuous improvement methods

3.0333

It indicates that the support to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were not so evident.

11. Administrator’s knowledge about continuous improvement methods

3.1167

It indicates that the support to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were not so evident.

12. Departmental rewards or recognition tied to successful implementation

3.0000

It indicates that the support to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were not so evident.

13. Individual rewards or recognition tied to successful implementation

3.0500

It indicates that the support to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were not so evident.

14. Financial incentives

3.0333

It indicates that the support to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were not so evident.

15. Faculty development

3.1833

It indicates that the support to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were not so evident.

OVERALL MEAN

3.0350

It indicates that the support to CQI in the TEI’s during the period covered in this study were not so evident.