No | Nigeria’s Response to Sustain ability Targets | Government’s response to Climatic conditions |
1. | Poor response | Government Non-Priority |
2. | Politicalised |
|
3. | Quite Poor | Poor enforcement |
4. | Very poor | No Response |
5. | Implementation is poor | Negative, late approach |
6. | Inadequate | Inefficient |
7. | Inadequate | Poor response |
8. | Rare/reactive | Not encouraging, lack of enlightenment |
9. | No visible target | Passive response |
10. | Poorly/reactive | Poor |
11. | Not working | Very poor, not encouraging |
12. | Research Stations, carrying out survey | The use of dams to serve as irrigational purposes during dry seasons |
13. | Fairly, slow implementation | Slow, because of poor implementation of its policy |
14. | Poor | Poor, none |
15. |
| No proactive action |
16. |
| Not much, few plant trees |
17. | Poor | Average, some states respond well |
18. | Negative | Usage of wood, deforestation and encouraging afforestation |
19. | Poor | Nothing |
20. | Moving far away from target | Nothing, but now constructing drainages |
21. | No planning | No strategy in place |
22. | Response is slow | Little measures |
23. | Poor response | Poor response |
24. | Commitment demonstrated but policy implementation is poor | Seeking help from international communities on environmental deforestation, erosion control etc. |
25. | Average, need for improvement | Slow implementation of policies |
26. | Low rate response, high growth rate and increase in hunger. | Poor response |
27. | Responding by increasing in-country production of goods, improving socio-economic market and encouraging entrepreneurs | Little to nothing |
28. | Pegged | Right steps not being taken, not doing enough |
29. |
| No serious plans |
30. | Responding by championing local production | Nothing reasonable |
31. | Encouraging local agricultural products while closing borders | Indifferent to climate change, continuing flaring of gas in southern Nigeria |
32. |
| No clear measures |
33. | Reluctant and unconcerned | None interest, internal interventions |
34. | Slow, not meeting targets | Not been tackled |
35. | Very slow, very poor | Very slow, very poor |
36. | So slow, do not meet target | Very poor, not proactive, reactive |
37. | Not much effort | No funding, little effort |
38. | Fair response, problem of continuity` | No evidence of responding |
39. | Fairly, slow implementation, lack of continuity when government is changed | Poorly |
40. | Fair | No response |
41. | No record of response | Government does not understand adverse effects hence poor response |
42. | Very poor, not encouraging | No funding, no research |
43. |
| Not a priority |
44. | No response | Dams provided in some northern countries to help irrigation |
45. | Slow and no implementation | Always prefer late response despite the need for timely response |
46. | Not responding adequately | Attempting to resettle cattle in affected areas |
47. | Very poor | Nonchalant, not responding |
48. | Responding poorly, little attention to renewal, no plan | Not responding |
49. | Slow response | Slow response |
50. | Response is not commendable | Poor |
51. | Noncompliance | Noncompliance |
52. | Low compared to other countries | Lackadaisical response |
53. | No response | Static, very poor |
54. | No sustainability plan | They don’t even know if there are climatic conditions, zero response |
55. | Poor implementation, lack of focus | Poor response, poor implementation process |
56. | Shameful | Lifeless response |
57. | Very slow | No record |
58. | Very discouraging | Lack of political will power, poor implementation of policies |
59. | Negative approach | Negative response |
60. | Poorly and reluctant | Dormant |
61. | Indigenous food production | Planting of trees |
62. | Politicalised | Complacent |
63. | Little or no implementation | No response |
64. | Nothing is being done | Preference for reactive measures |
65. | Far behind MDGs, not to mention SDGs | No policies are working |