No

Nigeria’s Response to Sustain ability Targets

Government’s response to Climatic conditions

1.

Poor response

Government Non-Priority

2.

Politicalised

3.

Quite Poor

Poor enforcement

4.

Very poor

No Response

5.

Implementation is poor

Negative, late approach

6.

Inadequate

Inefficient

7.

Inadequate

Poor response

8.

Rare/reactive

Not encouraging, lack of enlightenment

9.

No visible target

Passive response

10.

Poorly/reactive

Poor

11.

Not working

Very poor, not encouraging

12.

Research Stations, carrying out survey

The use of dams to serve as irrigational purposes during dry seasons

13.

Fairly, slow implementation

Slow, because of poor implementation of its policy

14.

Poor

Poor, none

15.

No proactive action

16.

Not much, few plant trees

17.

Poor

Average, some states respond well

18.

Negative

Usage of wood, deforestation and encouraging afforestation

19.

Poor

Nothing

20.

Moving far away from target

Nothing, but now constructing drainages

21.

No planning

No strategy in place

22.

Response is slow

Little measures

23.

Poor response

Poor response

24.

Commitment demonstrated but policy implementation is poor

Seeking help from international communities on environmental deforestation, erosion control etc.

25.

Average, need for improvement

Slow implementation of policies

26.

Low rate response, high growth rate and increase in hunger.

Poor response

27.

Responding by increasing in-country production of goods, improving socio-economic market and encouraging entrepreneurs

Little to nothing

28.

Pegged

Right steps not being taken, not doing enough

29.

No serious plans

30.

Responding by championing local production

Nothing reasonable

31.

Encouraging local agricultural products while closing borders

Indifferent to climate change, continuing flaring of gas in southern Nigeria

32.

No clear measures

33.

Reluctant and unconcerned

None interest, internal interventions

34.

Slow, not meeting targets

Not been tackled

35.

Very slow, very poor

Very slow, very poor

36.

So slow, do not meet target

Very poor, not proactive, reactive

37.

Not much effort

No funding, little effort

38.

Fair response, problem of continuity`

No evidence of responding

39.

Fairly, slow implementation, lack of continuity when government is changed

Poorly

40.

Fair

No response

41.

No record of response

Government does not understand adverse effects hence poor response

42.

Very poor, not encouraging

No funding, no research

43.

Not a priority

44.

No response

Dams provided in some northern countries to help irrigation

45.

Slow and no implementation

Always prefer late response despite the need for timely response

46.

Not responding adequately

Attempting to resettle cattle in affected areas

47.

Very poor

Nonchalant, not responding

48.

Responding poorly, little attention to renewal, no plan

Not responding

49.

Slow response

Slow response

50.

Response is not commendable

Poor

51.

Noncompliance

Noncompliance

52.

Low compared to other countries

Lackadaisical response

53.

No response

Static, very poor

54.

No sustainability plan

They don’t even know if there are climatic conditions, zero response

55.

Poor implementation, lack of focus

Poor response, poor implementation process

56.

Shameful

Lifeless response

57.

Very slow

No record

58.

Very discouraging

Lack of political will power, poor implementation of policies

59.

Negative approach

Negative response

60.

Poorly and reluctant

Dormant

61.

Indigenous food production

Planting of trees

62.

Politicalised

Complacent

63.

Little or no implementation

No response

64.

Nothing is being done

Preference for reactive measures

65.

Far behind MDGs, not to mention SDGs

No policies are working