High Outcome

Medium Outcome

Low Outcome

b1

b3

b2

b1 = 129

b3 = not b1 and not b2 = 13

b2 = -b1 = 11

“Yes” as the maximized TOV [b1 = 129] according to the TOV Totals.

153/13 for a ratio of 11.7692: 1 (with 1 implied) 11.7692 times more likely to be “Unknown” than to be a “Yes” or a “No” response replicated under the same conditions over time.

153/11 for a ratio of 13.909090…: 1 (with 1 implied) 13.909090… times more likely to be “No” than to be a “Yes” or an “Unknown” response replicated under the same conditions over time.

T r i θ 1 = T r i Mean of b1 = 129/153

T r i θ 1 = T r i Mean of b3 = 13/153

T r i θ 1 = T r i Mean of b2 = 11/153

Significant similarities of the Within Tri-Square Test Proportionate Mean Data for b1 respectively as θ1:

Significant similarities of the Within Tri-Square Test Proportionate Mean Data for b3 respectively as θ2:

Significant similarities of the Within Tri-Square Test Proportionate Mean Data for b2 respectively as θ3:

[0.843137255 = 84.3137255%

0.0849673202 = 8.49673202%

0.0718954248 = 7.18954248%]

The Final Insight Trend Analysis using TRIASIM (Trichotomous Analysis of Similarity) calculations to determine the prevalence of a particular TOV in this particular case has a Grand Total of [b1÷ b3 + b2] = 129/24 = 5.375 which yields a ratio of 5.375: 1, which means that there are 5.375 times more likely to have a response of “Yes” to the aforementioned initial Tri-Squared Research items than a response of “Unknown” or “No” replicated under the same conditions over time.