Variable | Model-1 | Model-2 | Model-3 | Model-4 | |
Constant | B (S.E) | B (S.E) | B (S.E) | B (S.E) | |
−0.727 (0.529) | 0.016 (0.627) | −0.780 (0.693) | −8.407 (1.498) | ||
Individual factors | Gender(reference group: female) Male | 0.079 (0.249) | 0.037 (0.255) | 0.017 (0.266) | −0.411 (0.395) |
Age | 0.007 (0.009) | 0.004 (0.009) | −0.004 (0.010) | 0.024 (0.015) | |
Marital status(reference group: married) Unmarried | 0.494 (0.351) | 0.609 (0.372) | 0.080 (0.402) | 0.333 (0.615) | |
Level of education(junior school or higher) |
|
|
|
| |
Illiterate or knowing little | −0.988*** (0.302) | −0.788** (0.312) | −0.645* (0.335) | −0.863* (0.510) | |
Elementary school | −1.086*** (0.333) | −0.941*** (0.345) | −1.000*** (0.360) | −1.829*** (0.583) | |
Family variables | Net income of households of the previous year |
| 0.161* (0.087) | 0.091 (0.091) | −0.489*** (0.154) |
Family income mainly from social security income (reference group: no) Yes |
| 0.427 (0.329) | 0.359 (0.352) | 0.348 (0.513) | |
The number of the disabled of family |
| −0.795*** (0.277) | −0.671** (0.293) | −0.568 (0.446) | |
Disability characteristic | Self-care ability (totally taking care of themselves) |
|
|
|
|
totally not taking care of themselves |
|
| −0.496 (0.447) | 0.130 (0.610) | |
Partly taking care of themselves |
|
| 0.573** (0.282) | 1.219*** (0.444) | |
Congenital disability or not (No) |
|
|
|
| |
Congenital disability |
|
| −1.739*** (0.411) | −1.371*** (0.584) | |
Cognitive of rehabilitation | Cognition of rehabilitation demand (reference group: not demand) Demand |
|
|
| 1.592*** (0.408) |
Level of understanding of rehabilitation service |
|
|
| 2.587*** (0.315) | |
Degree of satisfaction about work on the disabled |
|
|
| 0.642** (0.314) | |
Attention-degree of government and society |
|
|
| −0.446 (0.304) | |
R Square |
| 19.993 | 36.919 | 68.356 | 248.462 |
Df |
| 5 | 8 | 11 | 15 |
-2 Log likelihood |
| 427.220 | 410.294 | 378.856 | 198.750 |
Nagelkerke R Square |
| 0.076 | 0.137 | 0.243 | 0.701 |