Considerations |
Awareness Is MI used by individuals on a daily basis? If not, the likelihood is high that it will not be recalled (correctly). Is access to MI straightforward and easy, e.g. via, IT/databases, dedicated individuals? Does a pitch of current project and MI to inform/convince others/superiors exist? |
Targets Is detailed MI primarily provided to franchise heads/development leads—on a need to know basis, for alignment purposes—or distributed to all relevant personnel? Do multidisciplinary teams develop TPPs together? If so, this can improve MI dissemination. |
Timepoint Are regular (global) meetings within and across functions held to improve the dissemination and interpretation of MI? Is subsidiary: head-office: subsidiary exchange of more general (not necessarily market specific) MI frequent? This can improve MI alignment, and complement and validate existing MI. Are meetings held before regulatory application? This facilitates discussion, interpretation and collation of relevant MI. |
Mode Is the presentation of MI unbiased, succinct and actionable? Is MI governed across stages of development and teams? Development leads change over time. Without adequate governance, important information can be lost or difficult to retrieve in a timely manner. |