Date

Published

H0

km∙s−1∙Mpc−1

Observer

Remarks/Methodology

2021-12-08

73.3 ± 1.4

SH0ES

Cepheid-SN distance ladder (HST + Gaia EDR3 + Pantheon Plus SN Ia).

2021-09-17

69.8 ± 1.7

W. Freedman

Tip of the red-giant branch (TRGB) distance indicator (HST + Gaia EDR3).

2020-12-16

72.1 ± 2.0

Hubble Space Telescope and Gaia EDR3

Combining earlier work on red giant stars, using the tip of the red-giant branch (TRGB) distance indicator, with parallax measurements of Omega Centauri from Gaia EDR3.

2020-12-15

73.2 ± 1.3

Hubble Space Telescope and Gaia EDR3

Combination of HST photometry and Gaia EDR3 parallaxes for Milky Way Cepheids, reducing the uncertainty in calibration of Cepheid luminosities to 1.0%. Overall uncertainty in the value for H0 is 1.8%, which is expected to be reduced to 1.3% with a larger sample of type Ia supernovae in galaxies that are known Cepheid hosts.

2020-12-04

73.5 ± 5.3

E. J. Baxter,

B. D. Sherwin

Gravitational lensing in the CMB is used to estimate H0 without referring to the sound horizon scale, providing an alternative method to analyze the Planck data.

2020-11-25

71.8 3.3 + 3.9

P. Denzel, et al.

Eight quadruply lensed galaxy systems are used to determine H0 to a precision of 5%, in agreement with both “early” and “late” universe estimates. Independent of distance ladders and the cosmic microwave background.

2020-11-07

67.4 ± 1.0

T. Sedgwick,

et al.

Derived from 88 0.02 < z < 0.05 Type Ia supernovae used as standard candle distance indicators. The H0 estimate is corrected for the effects of peculiar velocities in the supernova environments, as estimated from the galaxy density field. The result assumes Ωm = 0.3, ΩΛ = 0.7 and a sound horizon of 149.3 Mpc, a value taken from Anderson et al. (2014).

2020-09-29

67.6 4.2 + 4.3

S. Mukherjee,

et al.

Gravitational waves, assuming that the transient ZTF19abanrh found by the Zwicky Transient Facility is the optical counterpart to GW190521. Independent of distance ladders and the cosmic microwave background.

2020-06-18

75.8 4.9 + 5.2

T. de Jaeger, et al.

Use Type II supernovae as standardisable candles to obtain an independent measurement of H.

2020-02-26

73.9 3.0 + 3.0

Megamaser Cosmology Project

Geometric distance measurements to Megamaser-hosting galaxies. Independent of distance ladders and the cosmic microwave background.

2019-10-14

74.2 3.0 + 2.7

STRIDES

Modelling the mass distribution & time delay of the lensed quasar DES J0408-5354.

2019-09-12

76.8 2.6 + 2.6

SHARP

H0LiCOW

Modelling three galactically lensed objects and their lenses using ground-based adaptive optics and the Hubble Space Telescope

2019-08-20

70.3 1.35 + 1.36

K. Dutta, et al.

This is obtained analyzing low-redshift cosmological data within ΛCDM model. The datasets used are Type-Ia Supernova, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, Time-Delay measurements using Strong-Lensing, measurements using Cosmic Chronometers and growth measurements from large scale structure observations.

2019-08-15

73.5 1.4 + 1.4

M. J. Reid, D. W. Pesce, A. G. Riess

Measuring the distance to Messier 106 using its supermassive black hole, combined with measurements of eclipsing binaries in the Large Magellanic Cloud.

2019-07-16

69.8 1.9 + 1.9

Hubble Space Telescope

Distances to red giant stars are calculated using the tip of the red-giant branch (TRGB) distance indicator.

2019-07-10

73.3 1.7 + 1.7

H0LiCOW

collaboration

Updated observations of multiply imaged quasars, now using six quasars, independent of the cosmic distance ladder and independent of the cosmic microwave background measurements.

2019-07-08

70.3 5.0 + 5.3

LIGO and Virgo

detectors

Uses radio counterpart of GW170817, combined with earlier gravitational wave and electromagnetic data.

2019-03-28

68.0 4.1 + 4.2

Fermi-LAT

Gamma ray attenuation due to extragalactic light. Independent of the cosmic distance ladder and the cosmic microwave background.

2019-03-18

74.03 1.42 + 1.42

Hubble Space Telescope

Precision HST photometry of Cepheids in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) reduces the uncertainty in the distance to the LMC from 2.5% to 1.3%. The revision increases the tension with CMB measurements to the 4.4σ level (P = 99.999% for Gaussian errors), raising the discrepancy beyond a plausible level of chance. Continuation of a collaboration known as Supernovae, for the Equation of State of Dark Energy (SHoES).

2019-02-08

67.78 0.87 + 0.91

Joseph Ryan,

et al.

Quasar angular size and baryon acoustic oscillations, assuming a flat LambdaCDM model. Alternative models result in different (generally lower) values for the Hubble constant.