Base | L | % of correct prediction of text fragment sequence | Advantage of NFIM (%) | ||||||||
By unconditional probability | By 1st fragment | By 2nd fragment | By mean probability | Method 1 | Method 2 | Method 3 | Method 4 | NFIM | |||
“Russian” | 1 | 35.62 | 24.32 | 22.82 | 18.64 | 18.65 | 15.56 | 16.06 | 17.26 | 10.87 | 43.15 |
2 | 9.97 | 6.59 | 6.54 | 5.37 | 5.37 | 5.09 | 4.98 | 4.94 | 4.13 | 19.61 | |
“German” | 1 | 21.45 | 16.25 | 12.07 | 11.40 | 11.86 | 10.58 | 10.08 | 9.88 | 6.97 | 41.75 |
2 | 11.78 | 8.25 | 6.97 | 6.61 | 6.62 | 6.03 | 6.00 | 5.66 | 4.55 | 24.40 | |
“Ukrainian” | 1 | 35.60 | 23.27 | 21.60 | 20.50 | 20.58 | 15.66 | 16.74 | 14.11 | 8.65 | 63.12 |
2 | 1.22 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 5.56 | |
“English” | 1 | 29.85 | 18.37 | 17.77 | 14.17 | 14.28 | 12.78 | 11.71 | 12.22 | 8.33 | 40.58 |
2 | 34.04 | 22.67 | 22.16 | 17.55 | 17.56 | 16.92 | 16.13 | 16.46 | 13.40 | 20.37 |