Name of method

Formula

Value

Difference from actual value 0.192308

Difference rank

1.

By unconditional probability

p ( le )

0.006458

−0.18585

8

2.

By conditional probability of a previous fragment

p ( le / ab )

0.233333

0.041025

5

3.

By conditional probability of a following fragment

p ( le / in )

0.002379

−0.189929

9

4.

By mean probability

p ( le / ab ) + p ( le / in ) 2

0.117856

−0.07445

7

5.

Method 1. Coefficients:

α 1 = 0.664 ; α 2 = 0.714 ;

α 3 = 0.001 .

α 1 p ( le / ab ) + α 2 p ( le / in ) + α 3

0.155632

−0.03668

4

6.

Method 2. Coefficients:

β 1 = 0.484 ; β 2 = 3.562 ;

β 3 = 0.002 .

β 1 p ( le / ab ) + β 2 p ( le / in ) + β 3

0.119407

−0.0729

6

7.

Method 3. Coefficient:

γ 1 = 0.707 ; γ 2 = 0.743 ;

γ 3 = 0.001 .

γ 1 p ( le / ab ) + γ 2 ( p ( le / in ) p ( le ) ) + γ 3

0.167734

−0.02457

3

8.

Method 4. Coefficient:

δ 1 = 0.682 ; δ 2 = 1.990 ;

δ 3 = 0.004 .

δ 1 p ( le / ab ) + δ 2 ( p ( le / in ) p ( le ) ) + δ 3

0.167867

−0.02444

2

9.

Non-force interaction method

a) Calculation of influence size

d ( le )

Δ d ( le / ab )

Δ d ( le / in )

b) Combined additional influence

Δ d ( le / ab in )

c) New quantity of information about the presence of fragment “le”

d ( le / ab in )

d) Estimate of probability of fragment a i presence (after both influences).

Δ d ( le / ab ) + Δ d ( le / in )

d ( le ) ( Δ d ( le / ab in ) ) 2 + 1 + Δ d ( le / ab in ) ( d ( le ) ) 2 + 1

0.5 + d ( le / ab in ) 2 ( d ( le / ab in ) ) 2 + 1

−6.161437

3.348290

−0.522639

2.825651

−0.830304

0.180596

−0.01171

1