HYPOTHESIS

CORRELATION ANALYSED

RESULTS

H₁: Gender and Ag have an influence on the effectiveness of internal communication

1) Gender/Equipped to Communicate Correlation

1) Pearson correlation coefficient of −0.2 and P-Value 0.210 (Fail to reject Null hypothesis)

2) Age/Communication correlation

2) Pearson correlation coefficient of −0.269 and P-Value 0.89 (Fail to reject Null hypothesis)

H₂: Communication skills of both the sender and the receiver of information influences the effectiveness of internal communication

1) Communication Training/Equipped to Communicate Correlation

1) Pearson correlation coefficient of −0.073 and P-Value 0.651 (Fail to reject Null hypothesis)

2) Education Level/Equipped to Communicate Correlation

2) Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.182 and P-Value 0.254 (Fail to reject Null hypothesis)

3) Communication with Products Team/Equipped with Product Information before Launch Correlation

3) Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.420 and P-Value 0.007 (Reject Null hypothesis)

4) Communication Skills of GOVCO/Effectiveness of Internal Communication Correlation

4) Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.469 and P-Value 0.002 (Reject Null hypothesis)

5) Correlation between Communication Skills of Line Managers/Effectiveness of Internal Communication

5) Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.317 and P-Value 0.046 (Reject Null hypothesis)

6) Subordinates Communication Skills/Impression of Internal Communication in the Bank

6) Pearson correlation coefficient of −0.21 and P-Value 0.924 (Fail to reject Null hypothesis)

H₃: Social systems influence the effectiveness of internal communication

1) Department/Impression of Internal Communication Correlation

1) Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.21 and P-Value 0.895 (Fail to reject Null hypothesis)

2) Time with Organisation/Equipped to Communicate Correlation

2) Pearson correlation coefficient of −0.274 and P-Value 0.83 (Fail to reject Null hypothesis)

3) Department/Access to Information Correlation

3) Pearson correlation coefficient of −0.081 and P-Value 0.618 (Fail to reject Null hypothesis)

4) Department/Quality of Communication with Other Departments Correlation

4) Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.116 and P-Value 0.471 (Fail to reject Null hypothesis)

H₄: Technology used has an impact on the effectiveness of internal communication

1) Effectiveness of Channels Used and Leaders Value of Communication/Feedback Correlation

1) Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.381 and P-Value 0.015 (Reject Null hypothesis)

H₅: Feedback is an important feature to achieve effective communication

1) Equipped to Communicate and Communicating Feedback Correlation

1) Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.314 and P-Value 0.045 (Reject Null hypothesis)

2) Management Value of Feedback and Staff Communicating Feedback Correlation

2) Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.470 and P-Value 0.002 (Reject Null hypothesis)