| Attributes: | “Status Quo” (specified as Option A in the DSS choice set) | Scenario 1: “Higher Density” | Scenario 2: “Higher Density and assembly parking” | Scenario 3: “Higher density, assembly parking and high frequency of public transport” | ||||||
| Density | Low density | High density | High density | High density | ||||||
| Quality of green | Low quality of green | Low quality of green | Low quality of green | Low quality of green | ||||||
| Centre | No centre | no centre | No centre | No centre | ||||||
| Development | Auto-oriented develop m. | Auto-oriented develop m. | Assembly parking | Assembly parking | ||||||
| Public transport | Low frequency | Low frequency | Low frequency | High frequency | ||||||
| Technical solutions | No | No | No | No | ||||||
| Social structure | Not mixed | Not mixed | Not mixed | Not mixed | ||||||
| Costs | Option A costs the same than Option B | Option A costs the same than Option B | Option A costs the same than Option B | Option A costs the same than Option B | ||||||
| Market Share: | SQ | Sc. 1 | N/N | SQ | Sc. 2 | N/N | SQ | Sc. 3 | N/N | |
| “Respondents with high environmental awareness”: | 0.5% | 2% | 97% | 0.5% | 5% | 95% | 5.0% | 28.0% | 67.1% | |
| “Respondents with low environmental awareness”: | 26% | 16% | 57% | 27% | 12% | 60% | 37.4% | 29.4% | 33.2% | |
| Total: | 21% | 14% | 65% | 22% | 11% | 67% | 30.9% | 29.1% | 39.9% | |