Authors & studies Design | No. de MII | MII rate (%) | Clinical pregnancy rate | Study size |
RCT |
|
|
|
|
Decleer [10] | 10.3 vs. 9.5 | ND | 31 vs. 44 | 120 |
Kim [11] | 9.0 vs. 8.9 | ND | 53 vs. 33* | 120 |
Mahajan [12] | 8.4 vs. 7.2 | ND | ND | 76 |
Eftekhar [13] | 8.8 vs. 7.9 | ND | 26 vs. 22 | 192 |
Schachter [17] | ND | ND | 44 vs. 29* | 211 |
Observ |
|
|
|
|
Zhou [15] | 6.6 vs. 5.8 | 75 vs. 73 | 62 vs. 52 | 325 |
Fabris [20] | 5.3 vs. 2.4* | 79 vs. 43* | 43 vs. 26* | 81 |
Zilberberg [21] | 6.5 vs. 3.6* | 68 vs. 47* | 50 vs. 0* | 12 |
Herbemont [22] | 9.1 vs. 5.5* | 71 vs. 47* | 31 vs. 23 | 47 |
Lin [23] | 2.75 vs. 2.85 | ND | 33 vs. 20 | 427 |
Meta-analysis |
|
|
|
|
Chen [17] | a | ND | b | 527 |
Ding [16] | a | ND | b | 527 |
Our study | 4.6 v 4.1 | ND | 5.9% vs. 26.5% | 51 |