Catalyst Applied | Method of synthesis | Test Conditions | Observations | CH4 Conversion % | Ref. | |
Achievement | Limitation | |||||
Pr promoted Ni-Mg-Al | Microwave-assisted self-combustion method | 600˚C & atmospheric pressure | 6 wt% of Pr decreased the formation of carbon deposits and improved the catalytic stability | Pr only increased the thermal stability but did not improve catalytic conversion | 58 | [91] |
Co2Ni2Mg2Al2 | Co-precipitation, Grinding and finally calcination at 800˚C for 4 h | 400˚C to 800˚ | More active and more stable (less deactivated by carbon) than commercial Ni(50%)/Al2O3 catalyst | Presence of toluene decreased the methane conversion | 97 | [49] |
Ce- and Y-promoted Htlc of Ni2+, Mg2+, Al3+ and/or Ce3+ | Co-precipitation followed by Y impregnation and then calcination at 550˚ | Range of 850˚ | Promotion of Ce increased both CO2 and CH4 conversions at the temperature range of 600˚C - 750˚C and 0.2 wt% loading of yttrium increased both CO2 and CH4 conversions during isothermal DRM tests | Catalyst promoted with Ce and 0.6 wt% of Y showed decreased catalytic performance and highest basicity. | 96.2 | [92] |
Ni & Fe promoted Htlc of Al & Mg | Co-precipitation followed by calcination at 500˚C for 5 h | 250˚C | Low amount of Fe activated the catalysts at low temperature (250˚C) | incorporation of higher amounts of Fe decreased catalytic activity | 99 | [93] |
Co supported Mg-Al | Co-precipitation and then calcination for 4 h at 600˚C | 700˚C & ambient pressure | Fantastic initial activity, significant long term stability, improvement in coke and sintering resistance | CH4 conversion is below 60% | 58.6 | [95] |
Co/Mg(Al)O | Co-precipitation, then calcination and reduction for 5 hat 800˚C | 500˚C - 750˚C | Co/Mg(Al)O-Htlc catalyst was found promising for CH4 reforming at low-temperature | At higher temperature (~750˚C) Co catalyst was inferior to Ni catalyst | 86.7 | [96] |
CeO2, ZrO2&ZnO promoted NiO/Mg(Al)O | Co-precipitation and then calcination at 600˚C in air for 6 h | 750˚C | The work presented kinetic and mechanistic insights into the functions of Ni-Htlc catalysts in DRM | The developed oxide promoted catalysts exhibited slightly lower activity than Ni catalyst | 75 - 80 | [97] |
Y promoted Ni containing Mg/Al | Co-precipitation and then calcination at 550˚C in air for 5 h | 600˚C - 850˚C | Y (yttrium) promotion raised the fraction of medium basic sites, reduced Ni crystallite size, and increased specific surface area | The total basicity of catalyst decreased due to Y (yttrium) promotion | 88 | [98] |
CoAl and CoFeHtlc | Co-precipitation followed by calcination at 800˚C in an oven for 6 h | Between 400˚C - 700˚C & atmospheric pressure | CoAl-Htlc catalyst showed better stability and higher catalytic activity during the DRM reaction compared to Co Fe-Htlc catalyst | Fe based catalyst exhibited lower reactivity due to the active phase re-oxidation by the water formed during reverse WGS reaction | 66.4 & 54.5 | [99] |
Zr- and Y-promoted Ni/Mg/Al-Htlc | Co-precipitation and then calcination at 550˚C in air for 5 h | 600˚C - 850˚C with a temperature step of 50˚C | Strong interaction between nickel and the promoted Htlc support with low H2 consumption was reported | Reducibility decreased | 72.7 | [100] |
Ni-Mg-Al | Co-precipitation & incipient wetness impregnation | 750˚C | Good stability against sintering and coking with improved activity was observed during DRM process having industrially relevant reaction conditions | During DRM carbon deposition in the catalyst increased at lower temperatures | 53.6 | [101] |