Teaching (Dissection)

Long Term Storage

Disadvantage

Advantage

Technique

Not tested

Extremely well when the coffin sealed

Toxic

Long term storage

Salafia (c. 1927-1933)

Not applicable

Not applicable

Only for isolated specimens

Good preservation of colour and form

Kaiserling (pulvertaft, 1950)

Satisfactory

Satisfactory

No data available

Easy storage

Jores (1896, 1913)

Highly satisfactory

No data available

Medium brown colour

Very active as fungicidal agent, soft and the plastic cheap

Woodburne & Lawrence (1952)

Satisfactory

Possible

No data available

Good preservation of intestines doesn’t affect the the dissector’s skin, odourless, objects sty smooth and elastic, colour-preserving

Peters (1956)

Satisfactory

Satisfactory

No data available

Soft and flexible less exsiccation

Erskine (1961)

No data available

Successful for 2 years

No data available

Decrease rigidity increased bactercidity and fungicidity, less Browning

Richins et al. (1963)

No data available

No data available

No data available

No data available

Dayton et al. (1965)

No data available

No data available

No data available

No data available

Beck (1966)

Satisfactory

No data available

No data available

Cheap, odourless

Tutsch (1975)

Satisfactory

No data available

No adequate fixation of brains

Moderate degree of movability and adequate degree of hardness for dissection

Bradbury & Hoshino (1978)

No data available

Almost unlimited, when vacuum packed

No data available

Increase fungicidity, cheap

Platzer et al. (1978)

Facilitates micro-dissection

Satisfactory

No data available

Soft preservation, obviates excessive noxious fumes

Logan (1983)

“Suitable”

Up to 10 years

Slight odour, headache, drowsiness, mild eye, nose and throat irritations

Soft and flexible

Frolich et al. (1984)

Satisfactory

No data available

Fluid accumulation

Smooth, colour-preserving

Frewein et al. (1987)

Satisfactory

No data available

No data available

“Well fixed”

Ikeda et al (1988)

Satisfactory

Proved up to 2.5 years

No data available

Formaldehyde vapour levels below COSHH limits, improved tissue preservation, more nature coloration

O’sullivan& Mitchell (1993)

Satisfactory up to 6 months

No data available

Grey hue of skin

Less toxic

Macdonald & MacGregor (1997)

Satisfactory

No data available

No data available

Excellent preservative properties, minimal structural distoration, tissue supple, little desiccation, natural colours

Coleman & Kogan (1998)

High acceptance

No data available

Expensive, disintegration of muscular tissue, limited for dissection

High colour preservation, smooth and flexible

Thiel (1992,2002)

No data available

No data available

No data available

No data available

Powers (2003)

No data available

No data Available

No data available

High mould preventiong

Mills (2010)

No data available

When waxed, possible

Hardening outside the tank, >2 days for re-softening

Not structural distortion, not colour changes

Al-Hayani et al. (2011)

No data available

Up to 1.5 years

No data available

Natueal appearance, odourless

Anichkov et al. (2011)

Limited usability

Up to 1year

Yellowish coloration, corrosion, disintegration of abdominal organs

Neutral smell

Janczyk et al. (2011a)

No data available

Up to 3 years

Expensive

Flexible tissues, aesthetic appearance, less toxic

Hammer et al. (2012)

No data available

Up to 2 years

Less toxic, good preservative properties, low volatility

Shi et al. (2012)

No data available

No data available (good for short term preservation ≤ 6 months)

No data available

Good coloration and flexibility

Goyri-O’Neill et al. (2013)