| Isolates | No of sensitive drugs | No of resistant drugs | Inference | Isolates | No of sensitive drugs | No of resistant drugs | Inference |
| 1 | 1 | 9 | GN only was Sensitive | 21 | 6 | 4 | GN, CE, NB, E, CT, CXM were sensitive |
| 2 | 1 | 9 | CT only was Sensitive | 22 | 4 | 6 | GN, E, CT CXM were Sensitive |
| 3 | 1 | 9 | Only CD was Sensitive | 23 | 3 | 7 | GN, CT, CXM were sensitive |
| 4 | 1 | 9 | Only E was Sensitive | 24 | 4 | 6 | NB, OF, CT, CXM were Sensitive |
| 5 | 4 | 6 | GN, CD, CE, NB were sensitive | 25 | 2 | 8 | CD, OF, were Sensitive |
| 6 | 1 | 9 | OF only was Sensitive | 26 | 0 | 10 | All were Resistant |
| 7 | 3 | 7 | E, OF, CXM are Sensitive | 27 | 2 | 8 | CD, CE were Sensitive |
| 8 | 2 | 8 | GN, CD were Sensitive | 28 | 1 | 9 | GN was Sensitive |
| 9 | 6 | 4 | GN, CD, CE, NB, OF, CT were Sensitive | 29 | 1 | 9 | CD was Sensitive |
| 10 | 2 | 8 | E, CXM were Sensitive | 30 | 1 | 9 | CD was Sensitive |
| 11 | 1 | 9 | CXM only was Sensitive | 31 | 1 | 9 | NB was Sensitive |
| 12 | 1 | 9 | CXM only was Sensitive | 32 | 1 | 9 | CXM was Sensitive |
| 13 | 0 | 10 | All were resistant | 33 | 1 | 9 | CD was sensitive |
| 14 | 0 | 10 | All were resistant | 34 | 1 | 9 | CIP was Sensitive |
| 15 | 2 | 8 | CT, CXM were Sensitive | 35 | 0 | 10 | All were Resistant |
| 16 | 4 | 6 | GN, CD CIP, CT were sensitive | 36 | 1 | 9 | OF only was Sensitive |
| 17 | 0 | 10 | All were resistant | 37 | 0 | 10 | All were Resistant |
| 18 | 1 | 9 | NB was sensitive | 38 | 1 | 9 | E was sensitive |
| 19 | 1 | 9 | GN was sensitive | 39 | 2 | 8 | GN, E were Sensitive |
| 20 | 2 | 8 | OF, E are sensitive | 40 | 2 | 8 | GN, OF were Sensitive |