| Functional results according to the criteria of Postel Merle d’Aubigné [10] | |
| Résultats Results | % |
| Excellent | 0 |
| Very good | 1 |
| Good | 5 |
| Poor | 0 |
| Bad | 1 |
| Quality of reduction according to Matta’s criteria [10] | |
| Anatomical | 1 |
| Satisfactory | 5 |
| Not satisfying | 1 |
| Head-to-Roof Congruence (TT) according to the criteria of Duquennoy et al. [10] | |
| TT0 | 0 |
| TT1 | 2 |
| TT2 | 5 |
| TT3 | 0 |
| Head-Cotyle Congruence (TC) according to the criteria of Duquennoy et al. [10] | |
| TC0 | 0 |
| TC1 | 3 |
| TC2 | 4 |
| TC3 | 0 |