| S. No | Author and Year | Method and treatment | Papers for review | Outcomes |
| 1 | Swanson, 2021 | Central mound pedicle and vertical technique is compared | 23 manuscripts were determined | Central mound pedicle reduce projection of breast than vertical technique |
| 2 | Delong, 2020 | Retrospective review with central mould pedicle | Papers were selected from 19 years | Central mound pedicle is effective and safe approach for mammaplasty of reduction for unilateral symmetrising operations and bilateral macromastia patients |
| 3 | Bustos et al., 2020 | Patients who taken inferior pedicle mammoplasty for reduction-retrospective review | 5 years | It provides minimal risk of necrosis |
| 4 | Aggarwal, 2016 | Comparing superior-medial pedicle and inferior pedicle and | TIG database was used for obtaining lust of oncoplastic trainers and trainees associated with TIG national oncoplastic fellowship | Most of surgeons preferred superior-medial pedicle (62%) and 34 percent of surgeons preferred inferior pedicle technique |
| 5 | Blondeel et al., 2003 | Latero-central glandular pedicle technique for reducing breast | 68 procedures were reviewed | Because of maximized vascularisation of NAC, complications of wound were minimized with novel technique. NAC sensations was preserved in all cases |
| 6 | Yvorchuk, 1999 | Central pedicle technique for 18 years to 62 years | 50 consecutive cases | Minimal complication rate was observed |