H-DIBCO 2012 | Otsu | 99.96 | 1.24 |
Local adaptive | 99.25 | 1.96 | |
Sauvola | 98.08 | 1.18 | |
Nick | 99..43 | 1.57 | |
Proposed method | 99.37 | 2.62 | |
DIBCO 2013 | Otsu | 99.26 | 1.96 |
Local adaptive | 98.16 | 1.55 | |
Sauvola | 97.76 | 1.18 | |
Nick | 99.11 | 1.85 | |
| Proposed method | 99.65 | 6.95 |
DIBCO 2014 | Otsu | 98.72 | 1.25 |
Local adaptive | 98.68 | 1.11 | |
Sauvola | 86.66 | 1.16 | |
Nick | 92.52 | 1.14 | |
Proposed method | 98.82 | 2.10 | |
DIBCO 2016 | Otsu | 95.64 | 1.10 |
Local adaptive | 93.36 | 0.92 | |
Sauvola | 77.89 | 0.85 | |
Nick | 89.10 | 1.04 | |
Proposed method | 95.69 | 1.48 | |
DIBCO 2017 | Otsu | 98.24 | 1.25 |
Local adaptive | 98.43 | 1.21 | |
Sauvola | 89.80 | 1.60 | |
Nick | 96.63 | 1.64 | |
Proposed method | 98.68 | 4.37 | |
DIBCO 2018 | Otsu | 99.43 | 0.79 |
Local adaptive | 92.08 | 1.15 | |
Sauvola | 85.50 | 0.82 | |
Nick | 87.05 | 0.85 | |
Proposed method | 97.59 | 2.09 |