| Acteurs | Forces | Faiblesses |
| ABHL | Global vision of the uses on a hydrographic scale Consultation with the main actors and users of water Monitoring of measurement networks Competences and financial autonomy Planning over 10 years and prospective vision Integrated approach taking into account technical, economic, financial and institutional aspects | Distance from the action territory Discrepancies between river basins, water bodies and territorial issues Sectoral financing of water policy A somewhat limited consultation process Lack of administrative autonomy since the Ministry in charge often interferes in its work The agency’s action sometimes exceeds its legal missions, particularly in the management of hydraulic works No data on the environment to evaluate the impact of water withdrawals Few awareness actions |
| ONEE | Technical expertise | Lack of legislation specific to concessions Severity of the public domain regime Insufficient legal instruments Sectoral strategies and lack of convergence Lack of regulatory bodies and supervisory entities Lack of consultation and coordination with the communes and the services concerned when carrying out studies Inequitable distribution of water resources and mobilization of water at high prices in rural areas due to the uneven topography and scattered nature of the habitat Low rate of adherence of the local population to the water supply program |
| Services de l’État en charge des politiques à l’eau | Data and monitoring networks Relations with all water stakeholders and users ensured by regional and local departments Strong involvement in the consultation phases Evolution of practices towards more integration | Gaps in data homogenization and collection Failure of the water police Insufficient funding Lack of communication, awareness-raising actions |
| Département des Eaux et Forêts et Gestionnaire s forestiers | Actor in the field Long-term planning Management oriented towards the valorisation of non-market functions, hence a favourable context for taking water into consideration Significant role in the local economy Technical expertise in the development of water bodies and the fight against erosion | No skills to manage the forest in the perimeters of the springs Multifunctional management applied with difficulty due to lack of means Lack of involvement of elected officials in the management of their forests and little contact with water stakeholders Non-adapted sectoral financing. Difficulties during the delimitation of the forest estate Lack of consultation with ABHL Strained relations with local authorities and forest users |
| Région | Suitable structure to coordinate water management Strong links with the LCs thanks to its financial support | Lack of water management expertise |
| Collectivités territoriales | Relations with all stakeholders and users | No control over land resources Planning reduced to the electoral mandate Lack of technical and financial means Volume of wastewater discharged without pre-treatment into the receiving environment (wadi or sea) not quantified |
| Agriculteurs et department agricole | Multiple socio-economic and environmental functions Practice of PI and localized irrigation Awareness of water rationalization | Little data on farmers’ resources, consumption and discharges Little relationship with other water stakeholders Poorly targeted sectoral funding |
| Département, Institutionne ls et Représentan ts du Tourisme | Policy of diversification of the tourist offer based on water Equipping tourist establishments with water and energy saving equipment | Few awareness and communication actions Limited consultation with other stakeholders Absence of a representative of the use within the Board of Directors of the ABHL’s Board of Directors |
| Secteur privé (bureaux d’études) | Partnership with ONEE and ABHL, … Competences and efficient techniques Studies and works programmed in the master plans | These contractors are excluded from all water policy consultation processes |
| Chercheurs et Scientifiques | Mastery of techniques and expertise | Low involvement in the water decision-making process |