Study

Intervention

Key results-Depression

Cajanding (2016)

Philippines

Setting: Community

100 Adult participants (Age 37 - 74 yrs)

Nurse-Led CBT (n = 52)

vs. Standard Care (n = 48)

Results at 3 months, mood score measured by the CDS in the intervention group was significantly improved compared with the standard care group (p < 0.01).

Dekker et al. (2012)

Kentucky, USA

Setting: Hospital

41 adult patients

Age: 66 ± 11 (SD), Brief cognitive therapy (n = 20)

vs.

Usual care (n = 21).

Results at 3 months, No significant improvement in Depressive symptoms measured by BDI-II in the CBT intervention group.

Freedland et al. (2015)

Washington DC,

USA

Setting: Community

158 adult participants,

Age: 55.8 ± 11.2,

CBT plus usual care (n = 79),

Vs. Usual care (n = 79)

Results at 3months, Depression score measured by BDI-II score was not significant in the CBT group. Depression score measured with BDI-II at 6 months and 1 year showed significant improvement (p = 0.008; p = 0.005, respectively). Significant improvement noted in depression at 6months follow up of CBT intervention on HAM-D and NIH PROMIS measures (p < 0.001).

Gary et al. (2010)

Georgia, USA

Setting: Community

74 adult patients, 4 groups,

Age: 65.8 ± 13

CBT: (n = 16)

Vs. Usual care: (n = 14)

Results at 3/6 months, No significant improvement in depression score measured by HAM-D in CBT intervention group.

Lundgren et al. (2016)

Sweden

Setting: Community

50, Adult participants,

Age : 62.9 ± 12.8

ICBT (n = 25) vs. DF (n = 25)

Results at 9 weeks of CBT intervention, no significant improvement shown in primary ANCOVA analysis (p = 0.21). In group analysis, there was an improvement in depression measured by PHQ-9 (p = 0.02).