Evaluation projects | evaluation criteria | weights | Evaluation project | evaluation criteria | weights |
topic-selecting report (20%) | Preliminary investigation and preparation; | 3 | Concluding Report (50%) | The situation of the experimental work records , whether the experimental process is recorded in detail, accurately and in real time; | 2 |
The orderliness of the experimental scheme, the rationality of the experimental design, the feasibility of the method, etc.; | 2 | The ability to collect documentation, process information, and acquire new knowledge; | 1 | ||
The scientific nature of the topic, the novelty of the content, and the value of research; | 2 | Students can correctly design the experimental plan, complete the experimental work independently, and the experimental results are correct; | 1 | ||
Whether the research objectives are clear, whether there are visualized experimental processes and data, or quantifiable comparison results; | 3 | The student’s experimental workload is full and difficult, students work hard, their work style is solid and rigorous; | 2 | ||
Mid-term examinations (30%) | The situation of the experimental work records, including whether the experimental process is recorded in detail, accurately and in real time; | 3 | There is a sense of innovation in the experiment, or improvement and breakthrough in the work of the predecessors, or unique insights in the experiment; | 2 | |
The progress of the project, mainly preliminary experimental conditions; | 3 | Students can apply the knowledge and skills learned to discover, analyze and solve practical problems, correctly process experimental data, theoretically analyze the experiment, and draw valuable conclusions. | 2 | ||
The ability to solve difficulties; | 2 |
|
| ||
Whether the final overall plan is feasible and reasonable, and whether the next work plan is detailed. | 2 |
|
|