Evaluation projects

evaluation criteria

weights

Evaluation project

evaluation criteria

weights

topic-selecting

report (20%)

Preliminary investigation and preparation;

3

Concluding Report (50%)

The situation of the experimental work records , whether the experimental process is recorded in detail, accurately and in real time;

2

The orderliness of the experimental scheme, the rationality of the experimental design, the feasibility of the method, etc.;

2

The ability to collect documentation, process information, and acquire new knowledge;

1

The scientific nature of the topic, the novelty of the content, and the value of research;

2

Students can correctly design the experimental plan, complete the experimental work independently, and the experimental results are correct;

1

Whether the research objectives are clear, whether there are visualized experimental processes and data, or quantifiable comparison results;

3

The student’s experimental workload is full and difficult, students work hard, their work style is solid and rigorous;

2

Mid-term examinations (30%)

The situation of the experimental work records, including whether the experimental process is recorded in detail, accurately and in real time;

3

There is a sense of innovation in the experiment, or improvement and breakthrough in the work of the predecessors, or unique insights in the experiment;

2

The progress of the project, mainly preliminary experimental conditions;

3

Students can apply the knowledge and skills learned to discover, analyze and solve practical problems, correctly process experimental data, theoretically analyze the experiment, and draw valuable conclusions.

2

The ability to solve difficulties;

2

Whether the final overall plan is feasible and reasonable, and whether the next work plan is detailed.

2