| CAUSES FOUND AFTER INVESTIGATION | RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ACTORS | ||
| State | Population | Professionals | |
| 1. The law dating from 1993 is no longer adapted to the current situation, the population is obliged to take charge of its own affairs. | X
|
|
|
| 2. Subdivisions do not follow any law and are not supervised by the ministry responsible for the sector. | X |
|
|
| 3. Ignorance of this law at the population level |
| X | X |
| 4. Lack of follow-up and support in the application of the law by the public authorities | X |
|
|
| 5. The current trend of transforming the frontage of parcels or houses into commercial areas |
| X | X |
| 6. Building permits are granted without real control | X |
|
|
| 7. Passivity, greed, ignorance of the authorities who must enforce the law. (CORRUPTION) | X |
|
|
| 8. Lack of willingness to put things in order | X |
|
|
| 9. Lack of passive outreach of the law | X |
|
|
| 10. Impunity and absence of state authority | X |
|
|
| 11. Lack of precise information on the building code as in other countries (to regulate construction). | X |
| X |
| 12. Lack of experience in our state services and professionals on the urban and architectural level | X |
| X |
| 13. Lack of (financial) means for the work of public services | X |
|
|
| 14. The unwillingness of the population |
| X |
|
| 15. Conformity (others do it, so it’s normal) | X | X | X |
| 16. Lack of public awareness | X |
|
|
| 17. Lack of maintenance of its public spaces | X |
|
|
| 18. The violation of this one by the professionals of the land registry themselves, by subdivisions out of norms | X |
|
|
| 19. The lack of mastery of the latter by construction professionals |
|
| X |
| 20. The disorder caused by the non consideration of the competences recognized by the law (case of the law on the Order of Architects or Engineers for example) | X | X | X |
| 21. The misery of the agents and civil servants of the state, as well as the two-speed justice | X |
|
|
| 22. The abuse of certain public authorities, high ranking people in society. | X | X |
|
| 23. Bicephalism of action of the two services of the Urbanism and the Cadastre in the implementation of the allotments | X |
|
|
| 24. Politicization of sectors | X | X |
|
| 25. Weakness of the services concerned | X |
|
|